Testator, who had executed his will in triplicate, retained two originals in his possession, but only one of them could be found after his death. Plaintiff sought to probate this document, but the lower court held that the plaintiff had not rebutted the presumption of revocation arising from the loss or destruction of one duplicate and refused to grant probate. On appeal, held, reversed. The presumption that the testator destroyed one original with an intention to revoke his will is rebutted by the fact the testator had preserved another original in his possession. Jones v. Mason, (La. 1958) 99 S. (2d) 46
Testator, after providing in his will for the payment of debts and expenses of administration, devis...
Testator\u27s will, executed in 1944, named his wife executrix and sole devisee. One month before hi...
Wills and their revocation as we know them are peculiarly the result of the actions and reactions of...
Testator, who had executed his will in triplicate, retained two originals in his possession, but onl...
Testatrix executed three identical copies of her will. Counsel advised her that in the event she sho...
A recent Pennsylvania case, In re Ford\u27s Estate, is an interesting example of a situation which h...
The complaint alleged that testatrix who had executed a will leaving her whole estate to defendants ...
In a tort action to recover damages for the destruction of a will, plaintiff alleged that plaintiff\...
Testator deposited his last will and testament with a trust company for safekeeping and received a r...
Oral testimony of a lost revoking instrument is not admissible to defeat an existing valid will. A r...
Kate Miller Levring executed two wills, the first in 1954, the second in 1955. The latter contained ...
Testator, about to undergo a serious operation, executed a will leaving $5,000 to his fiancée and th...
Decedent executed a will in which he exercised a general testamentary power of appointment making pl...
Testatrix provided in her will that she intentionally omitted all of her heirs not specifically ment...
Among the oldest rules in the law of wills are those by which a will is held to be revoked by implic...
Testator, after providing in his will for the payment of debts and expenses of administration, devis...
Testator\u27s will, executed in 1944, named his wife executrix and sole devisee. One month before hi...
Wills and their revocation as we know them are peculiarly the result of the actions and reactions of...
Testator, who had executed his will in triplicate, retained two originals in his possession, but onl...
Testatrix executed three identical copies of her will. Counsel advised her that in the event she sho...
A recent Pennsylvania case, In re Ford\u27s Estate, is an interesting example of a situation which h...
The complaint alleged that testatrix who had executed a will leaving her whole estate to defendants ...
In a tort action to recover damages for the destruction of a will, plaintiff alleged that plaintiff\...
Testator deposited his last will and testament with a trust company for safekeeping and received a r...
Oral testimony of a lost revoking instrument is not admissible to defeat an existing valid will. A r...
Kate Miller Levring executed two wills, the first in 1954, the second in 1955. The latter contained ...
Testator, about to undergo a serious operation, executed a will leaving $5,000 to his fiancée and th...
Decedent executed a will in which he exercised a general testamentary power of appointment making pl...
Testatrix provided in her will that she intentionally omitted all of her heirs not specifically ment...
Among the oldest rules in the law of wills are those by which a will is held to be revoked by implic...
Testator, after providing in his will for the payment of debts and expenses of administration, devis...
Testator\u27s will, executed in 1944, named his wife executrix and sole devisee. One month before hi...
Wills and their revocation as we know them are peculiarly the result of the actions and reactions of...