We consider choice correspondences that assign a subset to every choice set of alternatives, where the total set of alternatives is an arbitrary finite or infinite set. We focus on the relations between several extensions of the condition of independence of irrelevant alternatives on one hand, and conditions on the revealed preference relation on sets, notably the weak axiom of revealed preference, on the other hand. We also establish the connection between the condition of independence of irrelevant alternatives and so-called strong sets; the latter characterize a social choice correspondence satisfying independence of irrelevant alternatives
A choice correspondence is weak justified if a non-chosen alternative is dominated by any other obta...
A reason-based choice correspondence rationalizes choice behaviour in terms of a two-stage choice pr...
This paper is concerned with the axiomatic foundation of the revealed preference theory. Many well-k...
We consider choice correspondences that assign a subset to every choice set of alternatives, where t...
We consider choice correspondences that assign a subset to every choice set of alternatives, where t...
We consider choice correspondences that assign a subset to every choice set of alternatives, where t...
An axiomatic foundation of revealed preference theory is obtained by formulating conditions on the m...
A choice correspondence is weak justified if a non-chosen alternative is dominated by any other obta...
A choice correspondence is weak justified if a non-chosen alternative is dominated by any other obta...
A choice correspondence is weak justified if a non-chosen alternative is dominated by any other obta...
A choice correspondence is weak justified if a non-chosen alternative is dominated by any other obta...
A choice correspondence is weak justified if a non-chosen alternative is dominated by any other obta...
A choice correspondence is weak justified if a non-chosen alternative is dominated by any other obta...
This paper considers social choice correspondences assigning a choice set to each non-empty subset o...
It is shown that a Pareto optimal and continuous single-valued choice function defined on the compac...
A choice correspondence is weak justified if a non-chosen alternative is dominated by any other obta...
A reason-based choice correspondence rationalizes choice behaviour in terms of a two-stage choice pr...
This paper is concerned with the axiomatic foundation of the revealed preference theory. Many well-k...
We consider choice correspondences that assign a subset to every choice set of alternatives, where t...
We consider choice correspondences that assign a subset to every choice set of alternatives, where t...
We consider choice correspondences that assign a subset to every choice set of alternatives, where t...
An axiomatic foundation of revealed preference theory is obtained by formulating conditions on the m...
A choice correspondence is weak justified if a non-chosen alternative is dominated by any other obta...
A choice correspondence is weak justified if a non-chosen alternative is dominated by any other obta...
A choice correspondence is weak justified if a non-chosen alternative is dominated by any other obta...
A choice correspondence is weak justified if a non-chosen alternative is dominated by any other obta...
A choice correspondence is weak justified if a non-chosen alternative is dominated by any other obta...
A choice correspondence is weak justified if a non-chosen alternative is dominated by any other obta...
This paper considers social choice correspondences assigning a choice set to each non-empty subset o...
It is shown that a Pareto optimal and continuous single-valued choice function defined on the compac...
A choice correspondence is weak justified if a non-chosen alternative is dominated by any other obta...
A reason-based choice correspondence rationalizes choice behaviour in terms of a two-stage choice pr...
This paper is concerned with the axiomatic foundation of the revealed preference theory. Many well-k...