Purpose and ObjectivesSince 2005 the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has funded organizations across the United States to promote screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) to detect early CRC or precancerous polyps that can be treated to avoid disease progression and death. The objective of this study was to describe how findings from economic evaluation approaches of a subset of these awardees and their implementation sites (n = 9) can drive decision making and improve program implementation and diffusion.Intervention ApproachWe described the framework for the implementation economics evaluation used since 2016 for the Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP) Learning Collaborative.Evaluation MethodsWe compared CRC interventi...
Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is recommended for adults aged 50–75 years, yet screening rates ar...
We applied a three-step process, abstracting and analyzing program budgets to examine how Colorectal...
Evidence-based interventions have been found effective in increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screeni...
IntroductionThe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) established the Colorectal Cancer C...
Understanding the cost of initiating and operationalizing colorectal cancer (CRC) control programs i...
The Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP) provided funding to 29 grantees to increase colorectal...
BACKGROUND:Multicomponent, evidence-based interventions are viewed increasingly as essential for inc...
Purpose and objectivesColorectal cancer (CRC) is the second-leading cause of cancer death in the Uni...
Purpose and objectivesColorectal cancer screening rates remain suboptimal in the US. The Colorectal ...
IntroductionSince 2009, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has awarded nearly $95 ...
Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening reduces CRC incidence and mortality but is underutilized. Effectiv...
We evaluated the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of two interventions designed to promote color...
Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates are suboptimal, particularly among the uninsured and the und...
Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is recommended for adults aged 50–75 years, yet screening rates ar...
We applied a three-step process, abstracting and analyzing program budgets to examine how Colorectal...
Evidence-based interventions have been found effective in increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screeni...
IntroductionThe Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) established the Colorectal Cancer C...
Understanding the cost of initiating and operationalizing colorectal cancer (CRC) control programs i...
The Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP) provided funding to 29 grantees to increase colorectal...
BACKGROUND:Multicomponent, evidence-based interventions are viewed increasingly as essential for inc...
Purpose and objectivesColorectal cancer (CRC) is the second-leading cause of cancer death in the Uni...
Purpose and objectivesColorectal cancer screening rates remain suboptimal in the US. The Colorectal ...
IntroductionSince 2009, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has awarded nearly $95 ...
Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening reduces CRC incidence and mortality but is underutilized. Effectiv...
We evaluated the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of two interventions designed to promote color...
Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates are suboptimal, particularly among the uninsured and the und...
Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is recommended for adults aged 50–75 years, yet screening rates ar...
We applied a three-step process, abstracting and analyzing program budgets to examine how Colorectal...
Evidence-based interventions have been found effective in increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screeni...