Testator, who had executed his will in triplicate, retained two originals in his possession, but only one of them could be found after his death. Plaintiff sought to probate this document, but the lower court held that the plaintiff had not rebutted the presumption of revocation arising from the loss or destruction of one duplicate and refused to grant probate. On appeal, held, reversed. The presumption that the testator destroyed one original with an intention to revoke his will is rebutted by the fact the testator had preserved another original in his possession. Jones v. Mason, (La. 1958) 99 S. (2d) 46
Decedent executed a will in which he exercised a general testamentary power of appointment making pl...
Among the oldest rules in the law of wills are those by which a will is held to be revoked by implic...
No issue in inheritance law has sparked as much debate as the requirements for making a valid will. ...
Testator, who had executed his will in triplicate, retained two originals in his possession, but onl...
Testatrix executed three identical copies of her will. Counsel advised her that in the event she sho...
A recent Pennsylvania case, In re Ford\u27s Estate, is an interesting example of a situation which h...
In a tort action to recover damages for the destruction of a will, plaintiff alleged that plaintiff\...
Oral testimony of a lost revoking instrument is not admissible to defeat an existing valid will. A r...
Testator\u27s will, executed in 1944, named his wife executrix and sole devisee. One month before hi...
The complaint alleged that testatrix who had executed a will leaving her whole estate to defendants ...
Testator, about to undergo a serious operation, executed a will leaving $5,000 to his fiancée and th...
Testator, after providing in his will for the payment of debts and expenses of administration, devis...
Testator deposited his last will and testament with a trust company for safekeeping and received a r...
Kate Miller Levring executed two wills, the first in 1954, the second in 1955. The latter contained ...
Testator\u27s will, executed in 1926, provided a trust fund for his adopted daughter, then a minor, ...
Decedent executed a will in which he exercised a general testamentary power of appointment making pl...
Among the oldest rules in the law of wills are those by which a will is held to be revoked by implic...
No issue in inheritance law has sparked as much debate as the requirements for making a valid will. ...
Testator, who had executed his will in triplicate, retained two originals in his possession, but onl...
Testatrix executed three identical copies of her will. Counsel advised her that in the event she sho...
A recent Pennsylvania case, In re Ford\u27s Estate, is an interesting example of a situation which h...
In a tort action to recover damages for the destruction of a will, plaintiff alleged that plaintiff\...
Oral testimony of a lost revoking instrument is not admissible to defeat an existing valid will. A r...
Testator\u27s will, executed in 1944, named his wife executrix and sole devisee. One month before hi...
The complaint alleged that testatrix who had executed a will leaving her whole estate to defendants ...
Testator, about to undergo a serious operation, executed a will leaving $5,000 to his fiancée and th...
Testator, after providing in his will for the payment of debts and expenses of administration, devis...
Testator deposited his last will and testament with a trust company for safekeeping and received a r...
Kate Miller Levring executed two wills, the first in 1954, the second in 1955. The latter contained ...
Testator\u27s will, executed in 1926, provided a trust fund for his adopted daughter, then a minor, ...
Decedent executed a will in which he exercised a general testamentary power of appointment making pl...
Among the oldest rules in the law of wills are those by which a will is held to be revoked by implic...
No issue in inheritance law has sparked as much debate as the requirements for making a valid will. ...