Under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, federal jury pools must reflect a fair cross section of the community in which a crime is prosecuted and from which no distinct group in the community is excluded. The community in which a crime is prosecuted varies widely in Indian country based on legislative reforms enacted by Congress to strip indigenous populations of their inherent sovereignty. Under the Major Crimes Act, the federal government has the right to adjudicate all serious crimes committed by one American Indian against another American Indian or non-Indian within Indian country. American Indian defendants under the Major Crimes Act are thus placed in federal district court for a crime that would ordinarily be tri...
Conflicts over the jurisdiction between tribal, state, and federal courts arise regularly due to the...
State and federal courts increasingly are being confronted with prosecutors moving the court to cons...
Throughout most of the history of federal Indian law, the United States Supreme Court has expressed ...
Under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, federal jury pools must reflect a fair ...
Unlike most sovereigns, American Indian tribes cannot exercise full territorial criminal jurisdictio...
This Article evaluates the federal Indian country criminal justice regime, not against norms of Indi...
Indian tribes in the United States are separate sovereigns with inherent self-governing authority. A...
This Note argues that the current federal laws regarding tribal criminal jurisdiction are contrary t...
The boundaries of modern tribal criminal jurisdiction are defined by a handful of clear rules—such a...
Over the past 500 years, American Indians have been subjected to inequalities through the United Sta...
The Kansas Act of 1940 is no longer relevant and continues to undercut tribal sovereignty. The Kansa...
The ambivalence of the federal government to the sovereignty of native tribes is ordinarily a quiet ...
To reduce crime, and sexual violence in particular, in Indian Country, Congress should “overturn” Ol...
Unprosecuted domestic violence committed by non-Indians in Indian Country is a serious problem, with...
This article critiques a proposal to include tribal court criminal convictions and sentences in the ...
Conflicts over the jurisdiction between tribal, state, and federal courts arise regularly due to the...
State and federal courts increasingly are being confronted with prosecutors moving the court to cons...
Throughout most of the history of federal Indian law, the United States Supreme Court has expressed ...
Under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution, federal jury pools must reflect a fair ...
Unlike most sovereigns, American Indian tribes cannot exercise full territorial criminal jurisdictio...
This Article evaluates the federal Indian country criminal justice regime, not against norms of Indi...
Indian tribes in the United States are separate sovereigns with inherent self-governing authority. A...
This Note argues that the current federal laws regarding tribal criminal jurisdiction are contrary t...
The boundaries of modern tribal criminal jurisdiction are defined by a handful of clear rules—such a...
Over the past 500 years, American Indians have been subjected to inequalities through the United Sta...
The Kansas Act of 1940 is no longer relevant and continues to undercut tribal sovereignty. The Kansa...
The ambivalence of the federal government to the sovereignty of native tribes is ordinarily a quiet ...
To reduce crime, and sexual violence in particular, in Indian Country, Congress should “overturn” Ol...
Unprosecuted domestic violence committed by non-Indians in Indian Country is a serious problem, with...
This article critiques a proposal to include tribal court criminal convictions and sentences in the ...
Conflicts over the jurisdiction between tribal, state, and federal courts arise regularly due to the...
State and federal courts increasingly are being confronted with prosecutors moving the court to cons...
Throughout most of the history of federal Indian law, the United States Supreme Court has expressed ...