Team decision-making prevails in modern organizations. Teams often need to decide whether to delegate or make a decision themselves. Recent work has found that many individuals assign a significantly positive intrinsic value to having a decision right, which may distort the choice between delegating a decision or not. Here we examine experimentally whether teams are also prone to such distortions. While in the aggregate we find no differences between individuals and teams, we uncover an important heterogeneity within teams. Teams with a smooth decision making process have much lower intrinsic values of decision rights than individuals, often not even significantly different from zero. Yet, teams with conflicts in reaching a decision have ve...
We argue that individuals use responsibility attribution heuristics that apply to collective decisio...
The recent literature on individual vs. group decision-making, in risky contexts, has brought about ...
We revisit the phenomenon that group decisions differ systematically from decisions of individuals. ...
Abstract: Philosophers, psychologists, and economists have long argued that certain decision rights ...
Even though decision-making in small teams is pervasive in business and in private life, little is k...
People differ in whether they like to be in control of a decision or whether they would happily dele...
Drawing upon resource-based view and social cognitive theory, this work develops a model that valida...
révision Août 2015We compare inequality aversion in individuals and teams by means of both within- a...
Drawing upon resource-based view and social cognitive theory, this work develops a model that valida...
Many important economic and political decisions are made by teams. May this observation be explained...
International audienceWe compare inequality aversion in individuals and teams by means of both withi...
Are the costs of time and effort spent on analyzing decisions outweighed by benefits? This issue was...
Making high quality decisions is central to organizations in order to remain competitive, increase p...
Consumers typically prefer freedom of choice, but when faced with a choice they might regret, they m...
Collective decision-making is the subfield of collective behaviour concerned with how groups reach d...
We argue that individuals use responsibility attribution heuristics that apply to collective decisio...
The recent literature on individual vs. group decision-making, in risky contexts, has brought about ...
We revisit the phenomenon that group decisions differ systematically from decisions of individuals. ...
Abstract: Philosophers, psychologists, and economists have long argued that certain decision rights ...
Even though decision-making in small teams is pervasive in business and in private life, little is k...
People differ in whether they like to be in control of a decision or whether they would happily dele...
Drawing upon resource-based view and social cognitive theory, this work develops a model that valida...
révision Août 2015We compare inequality aversion in individuals and teams by means of both within- a...
Drawing upon resource-based view and social cognitive theory, this work develops a model that valida...
Many important economic and political decisions are made by teams. May this observation be explained...
International audienceWe compare inequality aversion in individuals and teams by means of both withi...
Are the costs of time and effort spent on analyzing decisions outweighed by benefits? This issue was...
Making high quality decisions is central to organizations in order to remain competitive, increase p...
Consumers typically prefer freedom of choice, but when faced with a choice they might regret, they m...
Collective decision-making is the subfield of collective behaviour concerned with how groups reach d...
We argue that individuals use responsibility attribution heuristics that apply to collective decisio...
The recent literature on individual vs. group decision-making, in risky contexts, has brought about ...
We revisit the phenomenon that group decisions differ systematically from decisions of individuals. ...