Add to ORKGThis article considers the constitutional question of whether prisoners should be permitted to vote. The author discusses the case of Attorney General v Taylor and the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990, to conclude that the final say on this issue remains with the New Zealand Government
The paper examines whether there was any basis for Parliament to enact section 3(2) of the Supreme C...
Comments on the constitutional issues raised by decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Hi...
The Pricy Council decision in Jennings v Buchanan reasserted the judiciary’s role in deciding the am...
This article considers the constitutional question of whether prisoners should be permitted to vote....
The New Zealand High Court case of Taylor v. Attorney-General resulted in a formal declaration that ...
The question whether individuals sentenced to terms of imprisonment should be able to vote has arise...
This article provides commentary on the issue of prisoner voting, specifically the issue of prohibit...
The New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (NZBORA) retains Parliament’s sovereign power to make law. H...
Section 2(4) of the Criminal Justice Amendment Act (No 2) 1999 is incompatible with the cardinal ten...
The South African Constitution states that every adult citizen has the right to vote. There has ther...
This paper is about the voting rights of incarcerated Australian citizens. It begins by providing so...
In the wake of the High Court’s decision on prisoner enfranchisement, Graeme Orr describes the issue...
Copyright © 2009 NAPOThis article considers the issue of the prisoner’s right to vote in the light o...
When New Zealand’s Parliament legislates to the effect that law on some particular matter may only b...
This article explores and critiques the rationales for disenfranchising prisoners advanced by politi...
The paper examines whether there was any basis for Parliament to enact section 3(2) of the Supreme C...
Comments on the constitutional issues raised by decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Hi...
The Pricy Council decision in Jennings v Buchanan reasserted the judiciary’s role in deciding the am...
This article considers the constitutional question of whether prisoners should be permitted to vote....
The New Zealand High Court case of Taylor v. Attorney-General resulted in a formal declaration that ...
The question whether individuals sentenced to terms of imprisonment should be able to vote has arise...
This article provides commentary on the issue of prisoner voting, specifically the issue of prohibit...
The New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (NZBORA) retains Parliament’s sovereign power to make law. H...
Section 2(4) of the Criminal Justice Amendment Act (No 2) 1999 is incompatible with the cardinal ten...
The South African Constitution states that every adult citizen has the right to vote. There has ther...
This paper is about the voting rights of incarcerated Australian citizens. It begins by providing so...
In the wake of the High Court’s decision on prisoner enfranchisement, Graeme Orr describes the issue...
Copyright © 2009 NAPOThis article considers the issue of the prisoner’s right to vote in the light o...
When New Zealand’s Parliament legislates to the effect that law on some particular matter may only b...
This article explores and critiques the rationales for disenfranchising prisoners advanced by politi...
The paper examines whether there was any basis for Parliament to enact section 3(2) of the Supreme C...
Comments on the constitutional issues raised by decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Hi...
The Pricy Council decision in Jennings v Buchanan reasserted the judiciary’s role in deciding the am...