Managerial ownership and firm value: Evidence from New Zealand

The relationship between managerial ownership and firm value is examined for 79 listed companies in New Zealand Consistent with theoretical prediction in Jensen and Meckling (1976), ownership and firm value are positively related for ownership levels below 16% and above 58%. Results consistent with Demsetz (1983) were obtained for all other levels of ownership suggesting entrenchment and hence value loss. Our findings provide further support to existing evidence from the U.S. and the U.K. that managerial ownership and firm value have a nonlinear relationship.UnpublishedBerle, A.A.,Jr., Means, G.C., 1932. The modern corporation and private Property. New York: Macmillan, NY. Bowden, R. J., 1996. Kiwicap. An introduction to New Zealand capital markets. New Zealand : The Dunmore Press Ltd. Chung, K.H., Pruitt, S.W., 1994. A simple approximation of Tobin's Q. Financial Management 23, p 70-74. Demsetz, H., 1983. The structure of ownership and the theory of the firm. Journal of Law and Economics 26, p375-390. Demsetz, H., Lehn, K., 1985. The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy 93, p1155 – 1177. Fama, E.F., Jensen, M.C., 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics 26, p301-325. Fox, M.A., Walker, G.R., 1995. Evidence on the corporate governance of New Zealand listed companies. Otago Law Review 8, p317-349. Grossman, S., Hart, 0., 1982. Corporate financial structure and managerial incentives. In: McCall, L. (Ed.), The Economics of Information and Uncertainty, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, p107-137. Hossain, M., Prevost, A., Rao, R.P., 1998. Corporate Governance in New Zealand: The Effect of the 1993 Companies Act on board composition and firm performance. Massey University Working Paper. Jensen, M.C., Meckling, W.H., 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial Behaviour, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 4, p305-360. Jensen, M. C., Ruback, R.F., 1983. The market for corporate control. Journal of Financial Economics, p5-50. Kester, W.C., 1992. Industrial groups as systems of contractual governance. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 8, p24-44. Kole, S.R., 1995. Measuring managerial equity ownership: A comparison of sources of ownership data. Journal of Corporate Finance 1, p 413 – 435. McConnell, J.J., Servaes, H., 1990. Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics 27, p595 – 612. McConnell, J.J., Servaes, H., 1995. Equity ownership and the two faces of debt. Journal of Financial Economics 39, p131-157. Morck, R., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W., 1988. Managerial ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 20, p292-315. Peare. P,, 1999. An introduction to the New Zealand financial system. New Zealand: Addison Wesley Longman New Zealand Limited. Prevost, A.K., Rao, R.P., Hossain, M., 1999. The Determinants of Firm Performance and board Composition: Evidence from New Zealand. Massey University Working Paper. Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W., 1986. Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy 95, p 461-488. Short, H., Keasey, K., 1999. Managerial ownership and the performance of firms: Evidence from the U.K. Journal of Corporate Finance 5, p 79-101. Smith, A., Above Board: shedding light on management/director relationships. Smith, R. L., Kim, J., 1994. The combined effects of free cashflow and financial slack on bidder and target stock returns. Journal of Business, p281-310. Stiglitz, J.E., 1985. Credit markets and the control of capital. Journal of Money Credit and Banking 17 (2), p133-152. Stulz, R.M., 1988. On takeover resistance, managerial discretion and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics 20. White, H., 1980. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48, p817-838. 2