Informal SME networks: A Bourdieu based perspective

The aim of this thesis is to investigate the relationship between formal and informal intraorganisational networks. The notion that organisations are made up of interdependent relationships has led researchers to study more carefully the impacts that informal intraorganisational networks have on organisational life. Using a Bourdieu-based theoretical platform, this research investigates the relationship between context and informal intraorganisational networks in small-to-medium sized organisations in a New Zealand setting. An owner-manager perspective is adopted for the study and a qualitative research design is used to investigate the fundamental issue of why the differing contextual environments of organisations should influence the informal networks that exist within organisations. A post-structuralist approach to an interpretive investigation, utilising qualitative interviews, facilitated the reporting of empirical research, and theory development. The Bourdieu platform allows for the exploration of contextual issues using the concepts of field, habitus, and capital. Analysis of both interviews and secondary data concludes that informal intraorganisational networks differ contextually depending upon the type of organisation/industry group in which they are located. Further, elements of field such as traditions, unwritten norms, symbols, and customs also differ contextually in different organisations. Likewise, elements of habitus such as personal perceptions, levels and standards of living, and pride in work differ contextually as do elements of capital such as qualifications, skills, and the value of reputation. By way of example and explanation regarding theoretical properties, a comparison of trades based and non-trades based organisations is undertaken in the interview analysis. The research concludes that context does matter in an investigation into informal intraorganisational networks. Furthermore, networks in trades based businesses are highly predictable, have predictable characteristics and function in a dependable manner. Conversely, networks in non-trades based businesses are less predictable, are based on the personal characteristics of the members, and behave in a less dependable manner. These properties are exposed using the Bourdieu platform. Therefore, in terms of theory development, the results of this study suggest that the Bourdieu notions of field, habitus, and capital provide a sound theoretical platform for investigating informal intraorganisational networks. This is in sharp contrast to the positivist paradigm dominating research in the field to date.UnpublishedAndrews, S. (1995). Review Symposium. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 355-359. Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading: Addison-Wesley. acharach, S. (1989). Organizational Theories. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 496-515. Baldwin, T., Bedell, M., & Johnson, J. (1997). The Social Fabric of a Team-Based A Program: Network Effects on Student Satisfaction and Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40(6), 1369-1398. Bates, F. L., & Peacock, W. G. (1989). Conceptualising Social Structure: The Misuse of Structural Modelling. American Sociological Review, 54, 565-577. Beeby, M., & Booth, C. (2000). Networks and Inter-organizational Learning. The Learning Organization, 7(2), 75-88. Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley. Bonacich, P. (1995). Four Kinds of Social Dilemmas Within Exchange Networks. Current Research in Social Psychology, 1(1). Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Cambridge: Polity. Bourdieu, P. (1999). The Social Conditions of the International Circulation of Ideas. In R. Shusterman (Ed.), Bourdieu: A Critical Reader (pp. 220-228). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd. Bourdieu, P. (2000). Pascalian Meditations. (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press. Bourdieu, P. (2002). Cultural Power. In L. Spillman (Ed.), Cultural Sociology. Malden: Blackwell Publishers. Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press. Brass, D. (1984). Being in the Right Place: A Structural Analysis of Individual Influence in an Organisation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 518-539. Brass, D. (1992). Power in Organisations: A Social Network Perspective. In G. Moore & A. Whitt (Eds.), Research in Politics and Society (Vol. 4, pp. 295-323). Brass, D. (1995). A Social Network Perspective on Human Resources Management. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 13, 39-79. Brass, D., & Burkhardt, M. (1992). Centrality and Power in Organizations. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action (pp. 191-215). Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Brass, D., Butterfield, K., & Skaggs, B. (1998). Relationships and Unethical Behavior: A Social Network Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 14-32. Brockner, J., & Siegel, P. (1995). Understanding the Interaction Between Proceedural and Distributive Justice: The Role of Trust. In R. Kramer & T. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in Organizations. Newbury Park: Sage. Burkhardt, M., & Brass, D. (1990). Changing Patterns or Patterns of Change: The Effect of a Change in Technology on Social Network Structure and Power. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 104-127. Burns, R. (1994). Introduction to Research Methods: Longman Cheshire Pty Ltd. Burns, R., & Stalker, G. (1961). The Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock. Burt, R. (1980). Autonomy in a Social Topology. American Journal of Sociology, 85, 892-925. Burt, R. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Burt, R. (1997). The Contingent Value of Social Capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 339-365. Calhoun, C. (1993). Habitus, Field, and Capital: The Question of Historical Specificity. In C. Calhoun, E. LiPuma & M. Postone (Eds.), Bourdieu:Critical Perspectives. Cambridge: Polity Press. Calhoun, C., LiPuma, E., & Postone, M. (Eds.). (1993). Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives. Cambridge: Polity Press. Cameron, A., & Massey, C. (1999). Small and Medium Enterprises: A New Zealand Perspective. Auckland: Longman. Campbell, D. J. (2000). The Practive Employee: Managing Workplace Initiative. Academy of Management Executive, 14(3), 52-66. Campbell-Hunt, C., Brocklesby, J., Chetty, S., Corbett, L., Davenport, S., Jones, D., et al. (2001). World Famous in New Zealand: How New Zealand's Leading Firms Became World-Class Competitors. Auckland: Auckland University Press. Cappelli, P., & Sherer, P. (1991). The Missing Role of Context in OB: The Need for Meso-level Approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 13, 55-110. Carley, K. (1999). On the Evolution of Social and Organizational Networks. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 16, 3-30. Clegg, S., & Hardy, C. (1996). Organizations, Organization and Organizing. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of Organization Studies. London: Sage Publications Inc. Coetzer, A. (2002). Employee Learning and Development in the Small Business: Research Opportunities and Challenges. New Zealand Journal of Applied Business Research, 11(1), 21 - 28. Cone, M., & Everett, A. (2003). Information Asymmetry and Management Control Issues in a Sino-French IJV in China. Euro Asia Journal of Management, 13(25), 107-122. Contractor, N., Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (2001). Testing Multi-theoretical Hypotheses about Networks in 21st Century Organisation Forms: An Analytic Framework and Empirical Example. Paper presented at the Sunbelt Conference XXI. Curran, J., & Blackburn, R. A. (2001). Researching the Small Enterprise. London: Sage Publications. Curran, J., Jarvis, R., Blackburn, R. A., & Black, S. (1993). Networks and Small Firms: Constructs, Methodological Strategies and Some Findings. International Small Business Journal, 11(2), 13-25. Daft, R., & Lewin, A. (1993). Where are the Theories for the New Organisational Foims? An Editorial Essay. Organisational Science, 7(4), i-v. Danto, A. (1999). Bourdieu on Art: Field and Individual. In R. Shusterman (Ed.), Bourdieu: A Critical Reader. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers. Davidson, C., & Tolich, M. (1999). Social Science Research in New Zealand: Many Paths to Understanding. Auckland: Longman Paul. Decks, J., & Enderwick, P. (Eds.). (1994). Business and New Zealand Society. Auckland: Longman Paul. Denzin, N. K. (2002). The Interpretive Process. In M. Huberman & M. Miles (Eds.), The Qualitative Researcher's Companion. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Entering the Field of Qualitative Research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. (1998). The Landscape of Qualitative Research: Theories and Issues. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Ltd. DiMaggio, P. (1992). Nadel's Paradox Revisited: Relational and Cultural Aspects of Organisational Structure. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and Organisations: Structure, Form, and Action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Domigues, J. M. (2000). Social Integration, System Integration and Collective Subjectivity. Sociology, 34(2), 225-241. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550. Faul, J. (2002). Time and Place Matter: The Case for a Contextual Approach to Informal Intraorganisational Networks. Unpublished Master of Business Thesis, University of Otago, Dunedin. Fine, M., Weis, L., Wcseen, S., & Wong, L. (2000). For Whom? Qualitative Research, Representations, and Social Responsibilities. In N. K. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Ltd. Foddy, W. (1993). Constructing Questions for Interviews and Questionnaires: Theory and Practice in Social Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Fombrun, C. (1983). Attributions of Power across a Social Network. Human Relations, 36, 493-508. Freeman, L. C., White, D. R., & Romney, A. K. (Eds.). (1989). Research Methods in Social Network Analysis. Fairfax: George Mason University Press. Giddens. (1991). Sociology. Cambridge: Polity. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1968). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative research. USA: Weidenfeld & Nicholson. Goffman, E. (1973). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: The Overlook Press. Goffinan, E. (2002). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. In C. Calhoun, J. Gerteis, J. Moody, S. Pfaff & I. Virk (Eds.), Contemporary Sociological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380. Granovetter, M. S. (1982). The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited. In P. V. Marsden & N. Lin (Eds.), Social Structure and Network Analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage. Granovetter, M. S. (1985). Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481-510. Granovetter, M. S. (1992). Problems of Explanation in Economic Sociology. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and Organisations: Structure, Form, and Action (pp. 25-56). Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Granovetter, M. S. (1994). Business Groups. In N. Smelser & R. Swedberg (Eds.), The Handbook of Economic Sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Hammersley, M. (1996). The Relationship Between Qualitative and Quantitative Research: Paradigm Loyalty Versus Methodological Eclecticism. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods for Psychology and the Social Sciences. Leicester: BPS Books. Harker, R., Mahar, C., & Wilkes, C. (Eds.). (1990). An Introduction to the Work of Pierre Bourdieu. Basingstoke: Macmillan. Hill, J., McGowan, P., & Drummond, P. (1999). The Development and Application of a Qualitative Approach to Researching the Marketing Networks of Small Firm Entrepreneurs. Qualitative Market Research, 2(1), 71-82. Homans, G. C. (1950). The Human Group. London: Routledge. Huggins, R. (2000). The Business of Networks: Inter-firm Interaction, Institutional Policy and the TEC Experiment. Aldershot: Ashgate. Hussey, J., & Hussey, R. (1997). Business Research: A Practical Guide for Undergraduate and Post Graduate Students. New York: Palgrave. Ibarra, H. (1992a). Homophily and Differential Returns: Sex. Differences in Network Structure and Access in an Advertising Finn. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(3), 422-443. Ibarra, H. (1992b). Structural Alignments, Individual Strategies, and Managerial Action: Elements Toward a Network Theory of Getting Things Done. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and Organisations: Structure, Form, and Action (pp. 165-188). Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Ibarra, H. (1993a). Network Centrality, Power, and Innovation Involvement: Determinants of Technical and Administrative Roles. Academy of Management Journal, 36(3), 471-501. Ibarra, H. (1993b). Personal Networks of Women and Minorities in Management: A Conceptual Framework. Academy of Management Review, 18(1), 56-88. Ibarra, H. (1993c). Power, Social Influence and Sense Making: Effects of Centrality and Proximity on Employee Perceptions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(2), 277-305. Ibarra, H. (1995). Race, Opportunity, and Diversity of Social Circles in Managerial Networks. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 673-703. Ibarra, H. (1997). Paving an Alternative Route: Gender Differences in Managerial Networks. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60(1), 91-102. Ibarra, H. (1999). Provisional Selves: Experimenting with Image and Identity in Professional Adaptation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 764-791. Ingersoll, V. H., & Adams, G. B. (1992). The Tacit Organization. Greenwich: JAI Press Inc. Jarvinen, M. (2000). The Biographical Illusion: Constructing Meaning in Qualitative Interviews. Qualitative Inquiry, 6(3), 370-391. Johns, G. (2001). In Praise of Context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 31- 42. Kanter, R. M. (1989a). The New Managerial Work. Harvard Business Review, 69(6), 85-92. Kanter, R. M. (1989b). When Giants Learn to Dance: Mastering the Challenges of Strategy, Management, and Careers in the 1990s. London: International Thomson Business Press. Kanter, R. M. (1993). Men and Women of the Corporation (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books. Kanter, R. M., & Eccles, R. G. (1992). Making Network Research Relevant to Practice. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action (pp. 521-527). Boston: Harvard. Business School Press. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. (1966). The Social Psychology of Organizations. New York: Wiley. Kerr, A., & McDougall, M. (1999). The Small Business of Developing People. International Small Business Journal, 17(2), 65-74. Kilduff, M., & Krackhardt, D. (1994). Bringing the Individual Back In: A Structural Analysis of the Internal Market for Reputation in Organisations. Academy of Management Journal, 37(1), 87-108. King, N. (1994). Template Analysis. In C. Cassel, & Symon, G (Ed.), Qualitative Methods in Organisational Research. London: Sage. London: Sage Publications. Knuckey, S., Johnston, H., Campbell-Hunt, C., Carlaw, K., Corbett, L., & Massey, C. (2002). Firm Foundations: A Study of New Zealand Business Practices & Performances: Ministry of Economic Development. Kotter, J. P. (1982). The General Managers. New York: Free Press. Kotter, J. P., & Schlesinger, L. A. (1979). Choosing Strategies for Change. Harvard Business Review, 106-114. Krackhardt, D. (1990). Assessing the Political Landscape: Structure, Cognition and Power in Organisations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 342-369. Krackhardt, D. (1992). The Strength of Strong Ties: The Importance of Philos in Organizations. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action (pp. 216-239). Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Krackhardt, D. (1994). Constraints on the Interactive Organization as an Ideal Type. In C. Heckscher & A. Donnellon (Eds.), The Post-bureaucratic Organization: New Perspectives on Organizational Change (pp. 211-222). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Krackhardt, D. (1995). Review Symposium. In Administrative Science Quarterly (Vol. 40, pp. 350-358). Krackhardt, D., & Kilduff, M. (1990). Friendship Patterns and Culture: The Control of Organizational Diversity. American Anthropologist, 92, 142-154. Krais, B. (Ed.). (1991). The Craft of Sociology: Epistemological Preliminaries (Trans. R. Nice eng ed.). New York: Walter de Gruyter. Kvale, S. (1996). Inter Views: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing, Thousand Oaks: Sage. Labianca, G., Brass, D., & Gray, B. (1998). Social Networks and Perceptions of Intergroup Conflict: The Role of Negative Relationships and Third Parties. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 55-68. Lane, D. (Ed.). (1994). People Management in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises (Vol. 8). London: Institute of Personnel and Development. Lincoln, J. (1982). Intra- (and Inter) Organizational Networks. In S. Bacharach (Ed.), Research in the Sociology of Organizations (Vol. 1). Greenwich: JAI Press. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry, Beverley Hills: Sage. Locke, K. (2001). Grounded Theory in Management Research. London: Sage. Mahar, C., Harker, R., & Wilkes, C. (1990). The Basic Theoretical Position. In R. Harker, C. Mahar & C. Wilkes (Eds.), An Introduction to the Work of Pierre Bourdieu, Macmillan: Basingstoke. Marsden, P. (1990). Network Data and Measurement. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 435-463. Marx, W. (1985). Hermeneutics and the History of Being. In H. Silverman & D. Ihde (Eds.), Hermeneutics and Deconstruction. Albany: State University of New York Press. Maykut, P., & Morehouse, R. (1994). Beginning Qualitative Research: A Philosophic and Practical Guide. London: The Falmer Press. Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Expanded Source Book (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Ministry of Economic Development. (2002). SMEs in New Zealand: Structure and Dynamics. Wellington, NZ. Mintzberg, H. (1989). Mintzberg on Management: Inside Our Strange World of Organizations. New York: The Free Press. Mintzberg, H., & Van der Heyden, L. (1999, September-October). Organigraphs: Drawing How Companies Really Work. Harvard Business Review, 87-94. Monge, P. R., & Eisenberg, E. (1987). Emergent Communication Networks. In F. Jablin, 1. Putnam, K. Roberts & L. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Communication (pp. 304-342). Mowday, R., & Sutton, R. (1993). Organizational Behavior: Linking Individuals to Organizational Contexts. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 195-229. Neuman, W. (2000). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (4th ed.). Needham Heights: Pearson Education Company. Nohria, N. (1992). Is a Network Perspective a Useful Way of Studying Organizations? In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and Organisations: Structure, Form, and Action (pp. 1-22). Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Nohria, N., & Eccles, R. G. (Eds.). (1992). Networks and Organisations: Structure, Form, and Action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. O'Donnell, A., & Cummins, D. (1999). The Use of Qualitative Methods to Research Networking in SMEs. Qualitative Market Research, 2(2), 82-94. Olssen, E. (1995). Building the New World: Work, Politics and Society in Caversham 1880s-1920s. Auckland: Auckland University Press. O'Reilly, C. (1991). Organisational Behavior: Where We've Been and Where We're Going. Annual Review of Psychology, 42, 427-458. Parsons, T. (1960). Structure and Process in Modern Society. New York: Free Press. Pfeffer, J. (1982). Organizations and Organization Theory. Marshfield: Pitman. Podolny, J., & Baron, J. (1997). Resources and Relationships: Social Networks and Mobility in the Workplace. American Sociological Review, 62(5), 673-693. Rangan, S. (2000). The Problem of Search and Deliberate Action: When Social Networks Really Matter. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 813-832. Robbins, D. (1991). The Work of Pierre Bourdieu. Buckingham: Open University Press. Roethlisberger, F., Dickson, W., & Wright, H. (1933). Management and the Worker. New York: Wiley & Sons. Rousseau, D., & Fried, Y. (2001). Location, Location, Location: Contextualising Organizational Research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 1-13. Rudestam, K. E., & Newton, R. R. (1992). Surviving Your Dissertation: A Comprehensive Guide to Content and Process. Newbury Park: Sage. Salancik, G. (1995). WANTED: A Good Network Theory of Organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 345-349. Salancik, G., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A Social Information Processing Approach to Job Attitudes and Task Design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 224-253. Scandura, T., & Williams, E. (2000). Research Methodology in Management: Current Practices, Trends, and Implications for Future Research. Academy of Management Journal, 43(6). Schwandt, T. (1993). Theory for the Moral Sciences: Crisis of Identity and Purpose. In D. Flinders, G. E. Mills & E. Eisner (Eds.), Theory and Concepts in Qualitative Research: Perspectives from