The composition of public expenditure and growth: different models of government expenditure distribution by functions.

This paper provides a brief survey of the influence on economic growth of the composition of public expenditure by functions, concluding that countries tend towards a similar distribution in the steady state. In this light, we explore the existence of convergence in the structure of government spending in the OECD countries for the period 1970-1997 and the prospects of this process persisting in the future. The results obtained through the dissimilarity index, using the usual convergence indicators, and by means of cluster analysis point to the existence of a convergence process in the structure of government expenditure by functions. Nevertheless, we find that countries are approaching different equilibrium states in which two main models can be differentiated: one for some of the State members of the European Union (EU), and the other for almost the rest of the OECD countries. This suggests that there exist individual factors that impede convergence to a single distribution in the long run.UnpublishedAgell, J; Lindh, T. and Ohlsson, H (1997): “Growth and the Public Sector: A Critical Review Essay”, European Journal of Political Economy, vol. 13, n. 1, pp. 33-52. Agell, J; Lindh, T. and Ohlsson, H (1999): “Growth and the Public Sector: A Reply”, European Journal of Political Economy , vol. 15, n. 2, pp. 359-366. Alesina, A.; Perotti, R. and Tavares, J. (1998):”The Political Economy of Fiscal Adjustments”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Spring, pp 197-266. Alesina, A. and Perotti, R. (1995):”Fiscal Expansions and Adjustments in OECD Economies ”, Economic Policy, October, vol. 21, pp 207-248. Arellano, M, and Honore, B. (2001) "Panel Data Models: Some Recent Developments". forthcoming in: Heckman, J. and Leamer, E. (eds.): Handbook of Econometrics, Volume 5, North-Holland. Arellano, M. (1993): On the Testing of Correlated Effects with Panel Data", Journal of Econometrics, 59, 1993, 87- 97. Atkinson, P. and Van den Noord, P. (2000) “Managing public expenditure: some emerging policy issues and a framework for analysis” OECD Economics Department, n 285. Aubin, C., Berdot, J.P, Goyeau, D. and Lafay, J.D. (1988): “The growth of public expenditure in France”, in Lybeck, J.A. y Henrekson, M. (eds.): Explaining the Growth of Government, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam. Barro, R.J. (1990): “Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth”, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 106, pp. 407-444. Barro, R. and Sala-i-Martin, X. (1990): “Economic Growth and Convergence Across the United States”, NBER Working Paper, n. 3419. Barro, R. and Sala-i-Martin, X. (1992): “Convergence”, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 100, n. 2, pp. 223-51. Bleaney, M.; Kneller, R. and Gemmell, N. (1999): “Fiscal Policy and Growth: Evidence from OECD Countries”, Journal of Public Economics, vol. 74, pp. 171-190. Boyle, G.E and McCarthy T.G (1997): “A Simple Measure of ß-convergence”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, vol. 59, pp. 257-264. Boyle, G.E. and McCarthy, T.G. (1999): “Simple Measures of Convergence in per Capital GDP: a Note on Some Further International Evidence”, Applied Economics Letters, vol. 6, pp. 343-347. Cashin, P. (1995): Government Spending, Taxes and Economic Growth, IMF Staff Papers, Vol.42, No.2, June, pp 237-269. Chu, K.; Gupta, S.; Clements, B.; Hewitt, D.; Lugaresi, S.; Schiff, J.; Schuknecht, L.; and Schwartz,G.; (1995): “Unproductive Public Expenditures: A Pragmatic Approach to Policy Analysis”, IMF Pamphlet Series, n. 48. De la Fuente, A. (2000): “Convergence Across Countries and Regions: Theory and Empirics”, CEPR Discussion Paper Series, n. 2465. Devarajan, S.; Swaroop, V. and Zou, H. (1996): “The Composition of Public Expenditure and Economic Growth”, Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 37, pp. 313-344. Easterly, W. and Rebelo, S. (1993): “Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth”, Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 32, pp. 417-58. Everitt, B.S. (1993): Cluster Analysis, Edward Arnold, London. Florio, M, (1998): “On cross-country comparability of government statistics: public expenditure trends in OECD National Accounts” Working Paper, 98/06, Department of Economics, University of Milan. Gwartney, J.; Lawson, R.; and Block, W. (1996): Economic Freedom of the World: 1975-1995. Fraser Institute. Vancouver Hair, J.F. and Black, W.C (2000): “Cluster analysis”, in Grimm, L.G. and Yarnold, P.R. (eds.): Reading and understanding more multivariate statistics, American Psychological Association, Washington. Henrekson, M. (1988): “Swedish Government Growth. A Disequilibrium Analysis”, in Lybeck, J.A. and Henrekson, M. (eds.): Explaining the Growth of Government, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam. Jobson, J.D. (1991): Applied multivariate data analysis, volume 1: regression and experimental design. Springer-Verlag, New York. Johnson, R.A and Wichern, D.W (1998): Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis, Prentice Hall, New Jersey. Kamps, H. (1985): “Overheidsinvesteringen”, Economisch Statistische Berichten, vol. 70, pp. 189-189. Lebart L., Morineau A., Fenelon J.P. (1982): Traitement Des Données Statistiques, Dunod. Lindbeck, A. (1997): Welfare-State Dynamics. In: The Welfare State in Europe, Challenges and Reforms, European Economy (European Commission, Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs), No 4, 1997, pp 61-77. MacQueen, J.B (1967): “Some Methods for Classification and Analysis of Multivariate Observations” Proceedings of 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 1, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 281-297. Milligan, G.W. (1980): “An examination of the effect of six types of error perturbation on fifteen clustering algorithms”. Psychometrika, 45, 325-342. Milligan, G.W. and Cooper, M.C.(1985): “An examination of procedures for determining the number of cluster in a data set”. Psychometrika, 50(2), 159-179. O’ Higgins, M (1988): “The allocation of public resources to children and the elderly in OECD countries” in J.L Palmer, T. Smeeding and B.B Torrey (eds.): “The vulnerable”, Urban Institute Press, Washington, D.C. Oxley, H., Maher, M., Martin, J.P., Nicoletti, G. and Alonso-Gamo, P. (1990), The Public Sector: Issues for the 1990s, Working Paper No. 90, OECD Department of Economics and Statistics, Paris: OECD. Oxley, H. and Martin J.P (1991): “Controlling government spending and deficit: trends in the 1980s and prospects for the 1990s” OECD Economic Studies, 17, 145-189. Roubini, N. and Sachs, J. (1989) “Government Spending and budget deficits in the industrial countries” Economic Policy, 8, 99-132. Sanz, M.T. (1993): “La clasificación COFOG del Gasto Público en la CE. 1970-1988”, Hacienda Pública Española n 126-3, p.p 145-164 Saunders, P. and Klau, F. (1985): “The role of the public sector: causes and consequences of the growth of government”, OECD Economic Studies, 4, 11-239. Saunders, P (1993): “Recent Trends in the Size and Growth of Government in OECD Countries”, in Gemmell, N. (ed.): The Growth of the Public Sector, Edward Elgar Publishing, Aldershot. Shephard, R. (1966): “Metric structures in ordinal data” Journal of Mathematical Psychology 3, 287-315. Sturm, J.E. (1998): Public Capital Expenditure in the OECD Countries: the Causes and Impact of the Decline in Public Capital Spending, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham. Tanzi, V. and Zee H.H. (1997): “Fiscal Policy and Long-Run Growth”, IMF Staff Papers, vol. 44, n. 2, pp. 179-209. Tanzi, V. and Schuknecht, L. (2000): Public Spending in the 20th Century: A Global Perspective. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge. United Nations (1981): Classification of the Functions of Government, Statistics Studies, M, n. 70 New York. White, H.L. (1980): “A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix and a direct test for heteroskedasticity”, Econometrica, 48(4), 817-838. Ward, J.H. (1963): “Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function”, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 236-244