Asset ownership and foreign-market entry

This paper examines the link between a firm’s owership of productive assets and its choice of foreign-market entry strategy. We find that, controlling for industry- and country-specific characteristics, the most productive firms (i.e., those owning the most assets) will enter through greenfield investment, less productive ones will choose M&A, and the least productive ones will export. In addition, the most productive firms are shown to prefer whole ownership to a joint venture. These predictions are confirmed in an econometric analysis of Japanese firm-level data.UnpublishedAitken, B.J. and A.E. Harrison (1999), Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela, American Economic Review 89, 605-618. Asiedu, E. and H. Esfahani (2001). Ownership structure in foreign direct investment projects. Review of Economics and Statistics 83, 647-662. Bertrand, O., J.L. Mucchielli and H. Zitouna (2003). Location choices of multinational firms: the case of mergers and acquisitions. TEAM-University of Paris, mimeo. Bjorvatn, K. (2004). Economic integration and the profitability of crossborder mergers and acquisitions. European Economic Review, 48, 1211-1226. Caves, R.E. (1996). Multinational enterprise and economic analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Desai, M.A., C.F. Foley and J.R. Hines (2002). International joint ventures and the boundaries of the firm. NBER Working Paper #9115. Farrell, J. and C. Shapiro (1990). Asset ownership and market structure in oligopoly. Rand Journal of Economics 21, 275-292. Girma, S., Kneller, R. and M. Pisu (2005). Export versus FDI: an empirical test. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 141, 193-218. Greene, W.H. (2000). Econometric Analysis, Fourth Edition. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ Griliches, Z. and J. Mairesse (1990). R&D and productivity growth: comparing Japanese and US manufacturing firms. In: Hulten, C. (Ed.), Productivity Growth in Japan and the United States. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Harris, C. (1954). The market as a factor in the localization of industry in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 44, 315-348. Head, K. and J. Ries (2003). Heterogeneity and the FDI versus export decision of Japanese manufacturers. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies 17, 448-467. Helpman, E., M.J. Melitz and S.R. Yeaple (2004). Export versus FDI with heterogeneous firms. American Economic Review 94, 300–316. Horn, H.; Persson, L. (2001). The equilibrium ownership of an international oligopoly. Journal of International Economics, 53, 307-333. Irzano, S. (2004). FDI mode of entry and acquisition of firm specific assets. University of Sydney, mimeo. Levinsohn, J. and A. Petrin (2003). Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. Review of Economic Studies 70, 317-342. McFadden (1983). Qualitative response models. In: Griliches, Z. and M.D. Intrilligator, eds., Handbook of Econometrics. North-Holland, Amsterdam Maddala, G.S. (1983). Limited dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Markusen, J.R. (2002). Multinational firms and the theory of international trade. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Neary, P. (2003). Cross-border mergers as instrument of comparative advantage, mimeo Nocke, V. and S. Yeaple (2004). Mergers and the composition of international commerce. NBER Working Paper #10405 Perry, M.K. and R.H. Porter (1985). Oligopoly and the incentive for horizontal merger. American Economic Review 75, 219-227. Salant, S.W., Switzer, S., Reynolds, R.J. (1983). Losses From Horizontal Merger: The Effects of an Exogenous Change in Industry Structure on Cournot-Nash Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics 98, 185-199. Tekin-Koru, A. (2004). Is FDI indeed tariff-jumping? Firm-level evidence. Oregon State University, mimeo. UNCTAD (2000). World Investment Report 2000. United Nations, New York. UNCTAD (2004). World Investment Report 2004. United Nations, New York. Yi, S.-S., (1998). Endogenous formation of joint ventures with efficiency gains. Rand Journal of Economics 29, 610-631