This article explores the connection between two theses: the principle of conditional excluded middle for the counterfactual conditional, and the claim that it is a contingent matter which (coarse grained) propositions there are. Both theses enjoy wide support, and have been defended at length by Robert Stalnaker. We will argue that, given plausible background assumptions, these two principles are incompatible, provided that conditional excluded middle is understood in a certain modalized way. We then show that some (although not all) arguments for conditional excluded middle can in fact be extended to motivate this modalized version of the principle
In Counterfactual Conditionals, Daniel Dohrn discusses the standard account of counterfactuals, cond...
Philosophers typically rely on intuitions when providing a semantics for counterfactual conditionals...
According to propositional contingentism, it is contingent what propositions there are. This paper p...
In this chapter we consider three philosophical perspectives (including those of Stalnaker and Lewis...
The principle of Conditional Excluded Middle has been a matter of longstanding controversy in both s...
This paper defends the thesis that counterfactuals are strict conditionals. Its purpose is to show t...
Probabilities figure centrally in much of the literature on the semantics of conditionals. I find th...
Stalnaker argued that conditional excluded middle should be included in the principles that govern ...
over how we talk about modality. For example, Stalnaker endorses The limit assumption for counterfac...
. I carry out in this paper a philosophical analysis of the principle of excluded middle (or, as it ...
The paper provides an explanation of our knowledge of metaphysical modality, or modal knowledge, fro...
I carry out in this paper a philosophical analysis of the principle of excluded middle (or, as it is...
Since our capacities and methods of cognizing reality merely seem to tell us how things are but only...
In debates concerning the consequence argument, it has long been claimed that [McKay, T. J., and D. ...
Are counterfactuals with true antecedents and consequents automatically true? That is, is Conjunctio...
In Counterfactual Conditionals, Daniel Dohrn discusses the standard account of counterfactuals, cond...
Philosophers typically rely on intuitions when providing a semantics for counterfactual conditionals...
According to propositional contingentism, it is contingent what propositions there are. This paper p...
In this chapter we consider three philosophical perspectives (including those of Stalnaker and Lewis...
The principle of Conditional Excluded Middle has been a matter of longstanding controversy in both s...
This paper defends the thesis that counterfactuals are strict conditionals. Its purpose is to show t...
Probabilities figure centrally in much of the literature on the semantics of conditionals. I find th...
Stalnaker argued that conditional excluded middle should be included in the principles that govern ...
over how we talk about modality. For example, Stalnaker endorses The limit assumption for counterfac...
. I carry out in this paper a philosophical analysis of the principle of excluded middle (or, as it ...
The paper provides an explanation of our knowledge of metaphysical modality, or modal knowledge, fro...
I carry out in this paper a philosophical analysis of the principle of excluded middle (or, as it is...
Since our capacities and methods of cognizing reality merely seem to tell us how things are but only...
In debates concerning the consequence argument, it has long been claimed that [McKay, T. J., and D. ...
Are counterfactuals with true antecedents and consequents automatically true? That is, is Conjunctio...
In Counterfactual Conditionals, Daniel Dohrn discusses the standard account of counterfactuals, cond...
Philosophers typically rely on intuitions when providing a semantics for counterfactual conditionals...
According to propositional contingentism, it is contingent what propositions there are. This paper p...