Epistemology is sometimes said to be a normative discipline, but what this characterization means is often left unclear. This paper distinguishes two kinds of normativity and thereby provides a new way of understanding attributions of normativity. Associated with this distinction are two kinds of epistemological reflection. These are shown to be parallel to two kinds of ethical reflection. In the light of what emerges in showing these points, the paper clarifies the requirements for naturalizing epistemology, the place normativity might have, given certain kinds of naturalization, and the sense in which knowledge and justification may be viewed as normative
What do we mean when we say that a belief is justified? What justifies a belief? These are two very ...
Physical laws are irresistible. Logical rules are not. That is why logic is said to be normative. Gi...
Many epistemologists equate the rational and the justified. Those who disagree have done little to ...
Abstract: On the standard story about knowledge, knowledge has a normative dimension by virtue of th...
According to a view I’ll call Epistemic Normativism (EN), knowledge is normative in the same sense i...
This article offers an introduction to the recent debate on the nature of epistemic normativity and ...
There is something mysterious, and perhaps even dubious, about 'ought' claims. They seem to exert an...
According to a view I’ll call Epistemic Normativism, knowledge is normative in the same sense in whi...
This paper is an opinionated guide to the literature on normative (i.e., good) epistemic reasons. Af...
What is the source of epistemic normativity? In virtue of what do epistemic norms have categorical n...
This paper is an opinionated guide to the literature on normative epistemic reasons. After making so...
Recent attempts to resolve fundamental problems in epistemology by naturalizing epistemology appear ...
grantor: University of TorontoNaturalized epistemology gives epistemic priority to the que...
The main aim of this paper is to investigate what becomes of normativity in naturalistic epistemolog...
The main aim of this paper is to investigate what becomes of normativity in naturalistic epistemolog...
What do we mean when we say that a belief is justified? What justifies a belief? These are two very ...
Physical laws are irresistible. Logical rules are not. That is why logic is said to be normative. Gi...
Many epistemologists equate the rational and the justified. Those who disagree have done little to ...
Abstract: On the standard story about knowledge, knowledge has a normative dimension by virtue of th...
According to a view I’ll call Epistemic Normativism (EN), knowledge is normative in the same sense i...
This article offers an introduction to the recent debate on the nature of epistemic normativity and ...
There is something mysterious, and perhaps even dubious, about 'ought' claims. They seem to exert an...
According to a view I’ll call Epistemic Normativism, knowledge is normative in the same sense in whi...
This paper is an opinionated guide to the literature on normative (i.e., good) epistemic reasons. Af...
What is the source of epistemic normativity? In virtue of what do epistemic norms have categorical n...
This paper is an opinionated guide to the literature on normative epistemic reasons. After making so...
Recent attempts to resolve fundamental problems in epistemology by naturalizing epistemology appear ...
grantor: University of TorontoNaturalized epistemology gives epistemic priority to the que...
The main aim of this paper is to investigate what becomes of normativity in naturalistic epistemolog...
The main aim of this paper is to investigate what becomes of normativity in naturalistic epistemolog...
What do we mean when we say that a belief is justified? What justifies a belief? These are two very ...
Physical laws are irresistible. Logical rules are not. That is why logic is said to be normative. Gi...
Many epistemologists equate the rational and the justified. Those who disagree have done little to ...