Abstract The role that banks play in screening and monitoring their borrowers is well understood. However, these bank activities are costly and unobservable, thus difficult to contract upon. This introduces the possibility of shirking and leads to the question -who monitors the monitor? Financial intermediation theories posit that bank capital structure plays such a role in incentivizing banks to monitor their borrowers. Both bank debt and bank equity have been proposed in various theories as providing the discipline to induce banks to monitor. However, empirical evidence on how bank capital structure influences borrower monitoring is scant. To circumvent identification concerns with regressing (unobservable) bank monitoring on (endogenous)...