The engineering geology of a brecciated sub-unit in the Newer Volcanics of Melbourne and the implications for construction.

Geotechnical investigations undertaken by GHD Pty Ltd uncovered a previously undescribed rock type in the suburbs of Footscray and Alphington approximately 5 km west and 6.5 km east of Melbourne CBD respectively. The rock encountered appeared to be a breccia type rock with angular high strength fine gravel to boulder sized fragments of relatively unweathered grey to dark grey basalt surrounded by a matrix of orangish brown fine grained brittle material resembling hard clay. Pillow basalts were also encountered in the deposits in the form of 0.6 m or larger globular but highly fractured basalt bodies within the rock mass. The rock was eventually identified as a hyaloclastite, a rock type formed when basalt lava flows into water bodies and is quench fragmented. The debris forms piles of basalt and volcanic glass fragments. The volcanic glass fragments are thermodynamically unstable and are altered to palagonite within as little as 20 years from initial deposition. No prior reference to the occurrence of hyaloclastite in the Melbourne region could be found. As such, the location, extent and geotechnical properties of this rock type are unknown, posing a potential risk to infrastructure and construction projects. This study aimed to investigate the possible origins of the hyaloclastite; develop a theory of emplacement/origin; identify other locations where this rock type may exist; determine the geotechnical properties and engineering geological behaviour of the rock; and develop a classification system for the rocks encountered. A variety of methods were used to gather sufficient information to allow the occurrences and geological and geotechnical nature of hyaloclastites and pillow basalts in the Melbourne area to be better understood. Samples of the rock were obtained during the geotechnical investigations undertaken in Footscray and Alphington and outcrop mapping was completed on exposures identified during the course of this study. Historical borehole logs and as built drawings were obtained to assist in the understanding of the previous description terminology associated with the rock now identified as hyaloclastite. Standard and “non-standard” laboratory testing was undertaken as well as classification testing. The field of block-in-matrix rocks “bimrocks” was assessed as a possible method to assist in the understanding of the behaviour and geotechnical properties of the hyaloclastite rock with or without pillow basalts. The RMR, Q-System and GSI rock mass classification systems were used to help understand the rockmass characteristics. A weak rock classification system, a weathered rock characterisation system and a ground behaviour characterisation system were also used to provide information on the possible behaviour of the hyaloclastite type rocks. Development of both 2D and 3D geological models of the two sites indicate that the hyaloclastites encountered in Melbourne were deposited in “lava-deltas”. The hyaloclastites were deposited on advancing subaqueous delta fronts with an overlying layer of subaerial basalt above what has been termed the “passage zone” which represents the historical level of water into which the lava flowed. Strength testing undertaken on the various samples suggested that the hyaloclastite should be classified as a weak rock, with UCS values of ranging from approximately 1 MPa to 10 MPa, and a median UCS value of 1.37 MPa. Using the compiled UCS data and PLT data an estimate of the PLT Is50 to UCS conversion factor “k” was calculated as 10.4. The results of jar slake testing and weatherability index testing were variable: whilst the majority of samples showed no sign of slaking, one sample showed a strong reaction. The samples of disaggregated rock were classified as sandy gravel as per AS1726:1995. Whilst the fine to medium gravel was of subangular grains of basalt the sand was found to be made up of angular fragments of palagonite. Plasticity index and XRD testing of fines obtained from the disaggregation process indicated that the fines are comprised of illite and smectite clay minerals and behave as a high plasticity silt. Several categorisation methods utilised indicated that the hyaloclastite type rockmass strength parameters are controlled partly by the strength of the matrix and partly by the discontinuities and that the rock mass strength is dominated by the pillow basalt behaviour (typical hard rock type behaviours) only once the content of these structures in these rocks exceeds a volume content of 75% pillows to 25% hyaloclastite. Rock mass strength and deformation calculations indicate that the hyaloclastite rock mass is both very weak and also highly deformable (rock mass modulus