Comparison of measured and EF5-r derived N₂O fluxes from a spring-fed river

There is considerable uncertainty in the estimates of indirect N₂O emissions as defined by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's (IPCC) methodology. Direct measurements of N₂O yields and fluxes in aquatic river environments are sparse and more data are required to determine the role that rivers play in the global N₂O budget. The objectives of this research were to measure the N₂O fluxes from a spring-fed river, relate these fluxes to the dissolved N₂O concentrations and NO₃–N loading of the river, and to try and define the indirect emission factor (EF5-r) for the river. Gas bubble ebullition was observed at the river source with bubbles containing 7.9 µL N₂O L⁻¹. River NO₃–N and dissolved N₂O concentrations ranged from 2.5 to 5.3 mg L⁻¹ and 0.4 to 1.9 µg N₂O-N L⁻¹ respectively with N₂O saturation reaching 404%. Floating headspace chambers were used to sample N₂O fluxes. N₂O–N fluxes were significantly related to dissolved N₂O–N concentrations (r² = 30.6) but not to NO₃–N concentrations. The N₂O–N fluxes ranged from 38-501 µg m⁻² h⁻¹, averaging 171 µg m⁻² h⁻¹ (± Std. Dev. 85) overall. The measured N₂O–N fluxes equated to an EF5-r of only 6.6% of that calculated using the IPCC methodology, and this itself was considered to be an over-estimate due to the degassing of antecedent dissolved N₂O present in the groundwater that fed the river