Next in our #AcWri2016 series is a reflection on conversational writing and academic thought. Academic discussion typically appears as clustered conversations. Davina Cooper focuses on the dilemma posed by prefigurative contributions, where academics respond to a discussion as if it is taking place, treating it as if it were the one that ought to be taking place, even though speakers know the actual conversation is otherwise. What do prefigurative contributions actually contribute
This article explores the role of doubt and certainty in published research articles from eight acad...
Building Conversation is a collective of artists that creates dialogical art. In September 2019, I i...
This paper uses Conversation Analysis to investigate the ways in which participants in an online asy...
This article attempts to hold thought open in a textual space that often forecloses thought. The aut...
This essay contends that radical constructivism makes a mistake by focusing on cognition at the expe...
In this feature essay, Davina Cooper grapples with the charge that academic writing is incomprehensi...
There is a long-standing notion that in most instances of language use, the participants (whether sp...
This essay contends that radical constructivism makes a mistake by focusing on cognition at the expe...
This book argues that thinking dialogically is a vital foundation for critical intellectual work. Th...
This presentation contributes a personal reflection to the LiHERG symposium (at the 2015 EATAW confe...
In this dialogic piece we insist on the value of keeping alive critical debates about how academic k...
The idea of joining a conversation through reading and writing is not new; in his 1941 book The Phi...
This article provides an initial approach for capturing moments of talk about, around, and for writi...
Bourdieu (1999) has pointed out the relationship between our scholastic formation and the assumption...
Academic discussion deepens learning when students share multiple perspectives, challenge propositio...
This article explores the role of doubt and certainty in published research articles from eight acad...
Building Conversation is a collective of artists that creates dialogical art. In September 2019, I i...
This paper uses Conversation Analysis to investigate the ways in which participants in an online asy...
This article attempts to hold thought open in a textual space that often forecloses thought. The aut...
This essay contends that radical constructivism makes a mistake by focusing on cognition at the expe...
In this feature essay, Davina Cooper grapples with the charge that academic writing is incomprehensi...
There is a long-standing notion that in most instances of language use, the participants (whether sp...
This essay contends that radical constructivism makes a mistake by focusing on cognition at the expe...
This book argues that thinking dialogically is a vital foundation for critical intellectual work. Th...
This presentation contributes a personal reflection to the LiHERG symposium (at the 2015 EATAW confe...
In this dialogic piece we insist on the value of keeping alive critical debates about how academic k...
The idea of joining a conversation through reading and writing is not new; in his 1941 book The Phi...
This article provides an initial approach for capturing moments of talk about, around, and for writi...
Bourdieu (1999) has pointed out the relationship between our scholastic formation and the assumption...
Academic discussion deepens learning when students share multiple perspectives, challenge propositio...
This article explores the role of doubt and certainty in published research articles from eight acad...
Building Conversation is a collective of artists that creates dialogical art. In September 2019, I i...
This paper uses Conversation Analysis to investigate the ways in which participants in an online asy...