This paper shows that CEOs are fired after bad firm performance caused by factors beyond their control. Standard economic theory predicts that corporate boards filter out exogenous industry and market shocks from firm performance before deciding on CEO retention. Using a hand-collected sample of 3,365 CEO turnovers from 1993 to 2009, we document that CEOs are significantly more likely to be dismissed from their jobs after bad industry and, to a lesser extent, after bad market performance. A decline in industry performance from the 90th to the 10th percentile doubles the probability of a forced CEO turnover
The decision a Board of Directors (a board) makes to dismiss or retain its CEO is one of extreme imp...
We analyze the effect of CEO tenure on the relation between firm performance and forced turnover. We...
Several papers have evaluated the relationship between firm performance and CEO turnover. There is r...
This paper shows that CEOs are fired after bad firm performance caused by factors beyond their contr...
This paper revisits the relationship between firm performance and CEO turnover. Instead of classifyi...
This paper uses panel data from 271 U.S. firms to empirically examine the relationship between the d...
This paper uses panel data from 271 U.S. firms to empirically examine the relationship between the d...
There is considerable and widespread concern about whether CEOs are appropriately punished for poor ...
This paper studies a sample of CEOs from companies listed in the Dow Jones Industrial Average from 1...
To gain insights about the quality of board’s firing decisions, we investigate abnormal stock return...
Purpose - The authors study stock and option grants around abrupt performance declines for continuin...
This paper examines Wall Street Journal news stories about 79 firms that forced CEO turnover and a m...
Our analysis suggests that boards focus on deviation from expected performance, rather than performa...
This paper provides a cross-country analysis to determine whether CEO turnover is a credible discipl...
We apply duration analysis to model the tenure and mode of exit of CEOs from FTSE 350 companies from...
The decision a Board of Directors (a board) makes to dismiss or retain its CEO is one of extreme imp...
We analyze the effect of CEO tenure on the relation between firm performance and forced turnover. We...
Several papers have evaluated the relationship between firm performance and CEO turnover. There is r...
This paper shows that CEOs are fired after bad firm performance caused by factors beyond their contr...
This paper revisits the relationship between firm performance and CEO turnover. Instead of classifyi...
This paper uses panel data from 271 U.S. firms to empirically examine the relationship between the d...
This paper uses panel data from 271 U.S. firms to empirically examine the relationship between the d...
There is considerable and widespread concern about whether CEOs are appropriately punished for poor ...
This paper studies a sample of CEOs from companies listed in the Dow Jones Industrial Average from 1...
To gain insights about the quality of board’s firing decisions, we investigate abnormal stock return...
Purpose - The authors study stock and option grants around abrupt performance declines for continuin...
This paper examines Wall Street Journal news stories about 79 firms that forced CEO turnover and a m...
Our analysis suggests that boards focus on deviation from expected performance, rather than performa...
This paper provides a cross-country analysis to determine whether CEO turnover is a credible discipl...
We apply duration analysis to model the tenure and mode of exit of CEOs from FTSE 350 companies from...
The decision a Board of Directors (a board) makes to dismiss or retain its CEO is one of extreme imp...
We analyze the effect of CEO tenure on the relation between firm performance and forced turnover. We...
Several papers have evaluated the relationship between firm performance and CEO turnover. There is r...