The average delay between an executive nomination and confirmation by the US Senate is 120 days, but some nominees can experience delays of more than 400 or 500 days. In new research which examines over 8,000 bureaucratic nominations over 25 years, Ian Ostrander finds that nominations are targeted for delay based on their policy value, public importance, and the perceived ideology of the agency in question. For example, important agencies with low public importance, such as the Federal Election Commission, are often targeted by Senators for nomination delays
Over time, the Senate has developed a series of procedures to deal with the concerns of its Members ...
This article first briefly summarizes the issues that arise in the lower-court judicial confirmation...
In this piece, Professor Carl Tobias descriptively scrutinizes the nomination and confirmation regim...
Presidents have a strong incentive to control executive agencies through the nomination of like-mind...
While most executive nominees are successfully confirmed, this success masks wide variation in how l...
This Article explores the failure of nominations and the delay in confirmation of successful nomina...
As Professor Anne O’Connell has effectively documented, the delay in Senate confirmations has resul...
In this article, I conduct a statistical analysis of confirmation delays in the ratification of appo...
Key words: confirmation process, presidential nominations This paper analyzes the confirmation proce...
Experts have long agreed the transition from one presidential administration to another is a vulnera...
Traditionally, lower federal court nominations were confirmed swiftly and unanimously by the Senate....
Scholars, policymakers, and journalists have bemoaned the emphasis on ideology over qualifications a...
American politics is polarized as never before, something that is also reflected in Congress. This p...
While the U.S. Senate is now unable to make use of the filibuster to delay judicial nominees to fede...
All presidential administrations experience vacancies in agency leadership. Separation of powers mod...
Over time, the Senate has developed a series of procedures to deal with the concerns of its Members ...
This article first briefly summarizes the issues that arise in the lower-court judicial confirmation...
In this piece, Professor Carl Tobias descriptively scrutinizes the nomination and confirmation regim...
Presidents have a strong incentive to control executive agencies through the nomination of like-mind...
While most executive nominees are successfully confirmed, this success masks wide variation in how l...
This Article explores the failure of nominations and the delay in confirmation of successful nomina...
As Professor Anne O’Connell has effectively documented, the delay in Senate confirmations has resul...
In this article, I conduct a statistical analysis of confirmation delays in the ratification of appo...
Key words: confirmation process, presidential nominations This paper analyzes the confirmation proce...
Experts have long agreed the transition from one presidential administration to another is a vulnera...
Traditionally, lower federal court nominations were confirmed swiftly and unanimously by the Senate....
Scholars, policymakers, and journalists have bemoaned the emphasis on ideology over qualifications a...
American politics is polarized as never before, something that is also reflected in Congress. This p...
While the U.S. Senate is now unable to make use of the filibuster to delay judicial nominees to fede...
All presidential administrations experience vacancies in agency leadership. Separation of powers mod...
Over time, the Senate has developed a series of procedures to deal with the concerns of its Members ...
This article first briefly summarizes the issues that arise in the lower-court judicial confirmation...
In this piece, Professor Carl Tobias descriptively scrutinizes the nomination and confirmation regim...