This paper estimates the effects of Say-on-Pay (SoP), a policy that increases shareholder "voice" by providing shareholders with a regular vote on executive pay. We apply a regression discontinuity design to the votes on shareholder-sponsored SoP proposals. Adopting SoP leads to large increases in market value (5%) and to improvements in long-term profitability. In contrast, it has limited effects on pay levels and structure. Taken together our results suggest that SoP can be seen as a repeated regular vote of confidence on the CEO and that it serves as a disciplining device
This paper has won a runner-up prize in the Financial Studies 2022 Award in the Human Resources cate...
Shareholder investment horizons have a significant impact on say-on-pay voting patterns. Short-term ...
Typically, shareholders are not sure whether boards act in their interest or have been captured by m...
This paper estimates the effects of Say-on-Pay (SoP), a policy that increases shareholder "voice" by...
This paper estimates the effects of Say-on-Pay (SoP); a policy that increases shareholder "voice" by...
This paper estimates the effect of increasing shareholder “voice ” in corporations through a new gov...
The Dodd-Frank Act of 2010 mandated a number of regulatory reforms including a requirement that larg...
Manuscript Type: Review Research Question/Issue: This study focuses on the role of Say-on-Pay as a ...
The debate surrounding the Say-on-Pay regulatory policies introduced in the UK in 2002 has been plag...
"Say on pay" gives shareholders an advisory vote on a company's pay practices for its top executives...
It is well-understood that collective action problems and federal securities law limit communication...
A set of policy experiments regarding binding say-on-pay votes in Switzerland suggests that sharehol...
Say on pay gives shareholders an advisory vote on a company\u27s pay practices for its top executiv...
For the last two decades there has been quite a bit of debate about whether executives receive exces...
This research has implications for CEOs and board members. The findings suggest that voting results ...
This paper has won a runner-up prize in the Financial Studies 2022 Award in the Human Resources cate...
Shareholder investment horizons have a significant impact on say-on-pay voting patterns. Short-term ...
Typically, shareholders are not sure whether boards act in their interest or have been captured by m...
This paper estimates the effects of Say-on-Pay (SoP), a policy that increases shareholder "voice" by...
This paper estimates the effects of Say-on-Pay (SoP); a policy that increases shareholder "voice" by...
This paper estimates the effect of increasing shareholder “voice ” in corporations through a new gov...
The Dodd-Frank Act of 2010 mandated a number of regulatory reforms including a requirement that larg...
Manuscript Type: Review Research Question/Issue: This study focuses on the role of Say-on-Pay as a ...
The debate surrounding the Say-on-Pay regulatory policies introduced in the UK in 2002 has been plag...
"Say on pay" gives shareholders an advisory vote on a company's pay practices for its top executives...
It is well-understood that collective action problems and federal securities law limit communication...
A set of policy experiments regarding binding say-on-pay votes in Switzerland suggests that sharehol...
Say on pay gives shareholders an advisory vote on a company\u27s pay practices for its top executiv...
For the last two decades there has been quite a bit of debate about whether executives receive exces...
This research has implications for CEOs and board members. The findings suggest that voting results ...
This paper has won a runner-up prize in the Financial Studies 2022 Award in the Human Resources cate...
Shareholder investment horizons have a significant impact on say-on-pay voting patterns. Short-term ...
Typically, shareholders are not sure whether boards act in their interest or have been captured by m...