Add to ORKGRecent events at the Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC), the Parliamentary body tasked with holding MI5, MI6, and GCHQ to account, have shown the difficulty of knowing fully the activities of these organisations. Andrew Defty explores the possibility that representatives from GCHQ may have recently given a misleading impression to the ISC
The Investigatory Powers Tribunal recently found that government surveillance was unlawful, marking ...
As part of the U.K.’s electronic surveillance program, the Government Communications Headquarters (G...
In a democratic society, accountability is the requirement for those in positions of power to provid...
This article considers the growing parliamentary scrutiny of the intelligence and security agencies....
The establishment of the Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) in 1994 for the first time allowe...
Revelations from Edward Snowden about the scope of intelligence activities in the UK have led to ren...
Sean Kippin and the Democratic Audit team assess the ways in which the UK’s four main security servi...
© 2013 The Author. Oversight of intelligence and security agencies has become of significant interes...
In a recent speech, Lord Macdonald, the former Director of Public Prosecutions, was critical of the ...
The Intelligence and Security Committee which oversees Britain’s Security Services (MI5, SIS, and GC...
Last month, MI5 Director General Andrew Parker appeared on BBC Radio 4 to make the case for intellig...
In the wake of 9/11, the war in Iraq and the terrorist attacks in London, the Westminster parliament...
The nature of openness in government continues to be explored by academics and public managers alike...
In February of this year, the then-Chair of the Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) – the body...
How can democratic governments hold intelligence and security agencies accountable when what they do...
The Investigatory Powers Tribunal recently found that government surveillance was unlawful, marking ...
As part of the U.K.’s electronic surveillance program, the Government Communications Headquarters (G...
In a democratic society, accountability is the requirement for those in positions of power to provid...
This article considers the growing parliamentary scrutiny of the intelligence and security agencies....
The establishment of the Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) in 1994 for the first time allowe...
Revelations from Edward Snowden about the scope of intelligence activities in the UK have led to ren...
Sean Kippin and the Democratic Audit team assess the ways in which the UK’s four main security servi...
© 2013 The Author. Oversight of intelligence and security agencies has become of significant interes...
In a recent speech, Lord Macdonald, the former Director of Public Prosecutions, was critical of the ...
The Intelligence and Security Committee which oversees Britain’s Security Services (MI5, SIS, and GC...
Last month, MI5 Director General Andrew Parker appeared on BBC Radio 4 to make the case for intellig...
In the wake of 9/11, the war in Iraq and the terrorist attacks in London, the Westminster parliament...
The nature of openness in government continues to be explored by academics and public managers alike...
In February of this year, the then-Chair of the Intelligence and Security Committee (ISC) – the body...
How can democratic governments hold intelligence and security agencies accountable when what they do...
The Investigatory Powers Tribunal recently found that government surveillance was unlawful, marking ...
As part of the U.K.’s electronic surveillance program, the Government Communications Headquarters (G...
In a democratic society, accountability is the requirement for those in positions of power to provid...