In recent decades, U.S. states have embraced a number of different economic and social policies, depending on which party – Republican or Democratic – controls the government. David Wise examines the effectiveness of states’ differing approaches to policy by comparing their ranking across two dozen indices. He finds that due to higher levels of investment and fewer ‘culture war’ wedge issues, blue – or Democratic – states tended to score higher than their Republican counterparts in terms of economic strength, levels of social cohesion, and importantly, the state’s net Federal fiscal position
The recent fiscal austerity experiments undertaken in the states of Kansas and Wisconsin have genera...
We formulate a model to explain why the lack of political competition may stifle economic performanc...
Using panel data from US states over the period 1941-2002, I measure the impact of gubernatorial par...
This paper is looking for an empirical answer to the questions: Is a unified government’s performanc...
The election of 2004 appeared to cement in our cultural lexicon the terms “red state” and “blue stat...
For decades, the Democrats have been viewed as the party of the poor, with the Republicans represent...
For decades, the Democrats have been viewed as the party of the poor, with the Republicans represent...
This research tests the effects of changing party strength on the repre-sentativeness of policy-maki...
We examine state GDP comovement and consumption risk-sharing channels within the United States as a ...
Policy in the American States, Erikson, Wright, and McIver (1993) study the effects of individual st...
This study seeks to explain the transfer of U.S. federal funds to the states by examining the politi...
We find that income matters more in “red America ” than in “blue America. ” In poor states, rich peo...
Using panel data from US states over the period 1941-2002, I measure the impact of gubernatorial par...
This study identifies the political and economic variables that explain differences among US states ...
Using panel data from US states over the period 1941-2002, I measure the impact of gubernatorial par...
The recent fiscal austerity experiments undertaken in the states of Kansas and Wisconsin have genera...
We formulate a model to explain why the lack of political competition may stifle economic performanc...
Using panel data from US states over the period 1941-2002, I measure the impact of gubernatorial par...
This paper is looking for an empirical answer to the questions: Is a unified government’s performanc...
The election of 2004 appeared to cement in our cultural lexicon the terms “red state” and “blue stat...
For decades, the Democrats have been viewed as the party of the poor, with the Republicans represent...
For decades, the Democrats have been viewed as the party of the poor, with the Republicans represent...
This research tests the effects of changing party strength on the repre-sentativeness of policy-maki...
We examine state GDP comovement and consumption risk-sharing channels within the United States as a ...
Policy in the American States, Erikson, Wright, and McIver (1993) study the effects of individual st...
This study seeks to explain the transfer of U.S. federal funds to the states by examining the politi...
We find that income matters more in “red America ” than in “blue America. ” In poor states, rich peo...
Using panel data from US states over the period 1941-2002, I measure the impact of gubernatorial par...
This study identifies the political and economic variables that explain differences among US states ...
Using panel data from US states over the period 1941-2002, I measure the impact of gubernatorial par...
The recent fiscal austerity experiments undertaken in the states of Kansas and Wisconsin have genera...
We formulate a model to explain why the lack of political competition may stifle economic performanc...
Using panel data from US states over the period 1941-2002, I measure the impact of gubernatorial par...