Add to ORKGEd Miliband recently announced his desire for a new kind of Prime Ministers Questions, in which members of the public were invited to put the PM under scrutiny. Democratic Audit asked experts to respond to the proposal, with a seeming consensus that the idea isn’t necessarily a bad one, but doesn’t particularly amount to much of a change
The Speaker’s Commission on Digital Democracy recently produced a report which advocated a number of...
The authors compare two initiatives designed to enhance public participation in Australia: the Austr...
Many commentators initially welcomed the changes in public consultation introduced to speed up the r...
Is Ed Miliband’s idea for a “public Prime Minister’s Questions” a good one? Following on from part o...
We know about what the public thinks of PMQs, and we know an increasing amount about questions to PM...
Titus Alexander argues that current proposals for reforming the House of Lords will not address the ...
The Hansard Society recently published research which showed the public’s disapproval of the shoutin...
Prime Minister’s Questions is one of the most public venues for MPs to express their opinions and re...
Question Time is, in a sense, the highlight of any day of parliament. It is televised and attracts t...
As political leaders acknowledge the limits of their power and knowledge, they seek a diverse range ...
Prime Minister's Questions (PMQs) in the UK attracts much criticism for the adversarial and occasion...
From last Friday to Monday, sandwiched between official parliamentary sittings, a different type of ...
Parliaments, the conventional wisdom suggests, tend to be dominated by the executive, with little ab...
This was my submission to the Political and Constitutional Reform Select Committee inquiry into ‘Vot...
This paper examines how parliamentarians design their questions and flout parliamentary rules of que...
The Speaker’s Commission on Digital Democracy recently produced a report which advocated a number of...
The authors compare two initiatives designed to enhance public participation in Australia: the Austr...
Many commentators initially welcomed the changes in public consultation introduced to speed up the r...
Is Ed Miliband’s idea for a “public Prime Minister’s Questions” a good one? Following on from part o...
We know about what the public thinks of PMQs, and we know an increasing amount about questions to PM...
Titus Alexander argues that current proposals for reforming the House of Lords will not address the ...
The Hansard Society recently published research which showed the public’s disapproval of the shoutin...
Prime Minister’s Questions is one of the most public venues for MPs to express their opinions and re...
Question Time is, in a sense, the highlight of any day of parliament. It is televised and attracts t...
As political leaders acknowledge the limits of their power and knowledge, they seek a diverse range ...
Prime Minister's Questions (PMQs) in the UK attracts much criticism for the adversarial and occasion...
From last Friday to Monday, sandwiched between official parliamentary sittings, a different type of ...
Parliaments, the conventional wisdom suggests, tend to be dominated by the executive, with little ab...
This was my submission to the Political and Constitutional Reform Select Committee inquiry into ‘Vot...
This paper examines how parliamentarians design their questions and flout parliamentary rules of que...
The Speaker’s Commission on Digital Democracy recently produced a report which advocated a number of...
The authors compare two initiatives designed to enhance public participation in Australia: the Austr...
Many commentators initially welcomed the changes in public consultation introduced to speed up the r...