Why do candidates talk about the issues that they do? While many maintain that candidates running for office discuss specific issues in order to educate voters about their beliefs, John Barry Ryan argues instead that candidates may be clear, ambiguous, or even silent on issues depending on their district’s ideological similarity to their own views. Through an analysis of attitudes towards the Iraq war via statements on Congressional campaign websites, he argues that candidates who believe they are on the same side of the issue as their district are more likely to make clear statements, while those who are not are much more likely to remain silent
In campaigns, candidates often avoid taking positions on issues, concealing the policy preferences t...
Includes bibliographical references.The fundamental question raised in this paper concerns the condi...
This dissertation focuses on the psychological processes which connect people's own positions on pol...
Do candidates engage in dialogue with their opponents during election campaigns in the U.S? The conv...
I examine the formation and consequences of candidates' issue agendas -- the issues on which they fo...
Theories of candidate agendas suggest two potentially conflicting impera-tives for candidates: focus...
Why do political candidates who are largely office-motivated sometimes espouse views that are non-co...
In modern elections, ideologically motivated candidates with a wealth of information about individua...
This study is based on data from a three-wave telephone panel survey conducted during the 1998 gover...
How do politicians choose which issues to discuss in an election? Studying campaign behavior is impo...
This study employs computer content analysis to investigate the issue emphasis of political campaign...
A prominent avenue of the political campaign’s influence on voters is through the nature of its issu...
In most elections, voters care about several issues, but candidates may have to choose only a few to...
The theory of issue ownership holds that competing candidates should avoid discussing many of the sa...
When candidates engage in robust policy debate, it gives citizens clear choices on issues that matte...
In campaigns, candidates often avoid taking positions on issues, concealing the policy preferences t...
Includes bibliographical references.The fundamental question raised in this paper concerns the condi...
This dissertation focuses on the psychological processes which connect people's own positions on pol...
Do candidates engage in dialogue with their opponents during election campaigns in the U.S? The conv...
I examine the formation and consequences of candidates' issue agendas -- the issues on which they fo...
Theories of candidate agendas suggest two potentially conflicting impera-tives for candidates: focus...
Why do political candidates who are largely office-motivated sometimes espouse views that are non-co...
In modern elections, ideologically motivated candidates with a wealth of information about individua...
This study is based on data from a three-wave telephone panel survey conducted during the 1998 gover...
How do politicians choose which issues to discuss in an election? Studying campaign behavior is impo...
This study employs computer content analysis to investigate the issue emphasis of political campaign...
A prominent avenue of the political campaign’s influence on voters is through the nature of its issu...
In most elections, voters care about several issues, but candidates may have to choose only a few to...
The theory of issue ownership holds that competing candidates should avoid discussing many of the sa...
When candidates engage in robust policy debate, it gives citizens clear choices on issues that matte...
In campaigns, candidates often avoid taking positions on issues, concealing the policy preferences t...
Includes bibliographical references.The fundamental question raised in this paper concerns the condi...
This dissertation focuses on the psychological processes which connect people's own positions on pol...