Analysis of Alternative Plans - Colorado River Basin Project

Attachment: Analysis of Alternative Plans - Colorado River Basin Project Summary of Results, December 13, 1966, page 5-PLAN- Description RATE ASSUMPTIONS Irrig. SOURCES OF IRRIGATION ASSISTANCE All plans include the Central Arizona Unit and water salvage programs. Const. Water Rates Power Rates Cost $/A-F Mills/Kwh Irrig. M&I Commrl Irrig. M&I Sales Pump. Pump. Asst. Reqmt. $ Millions M&I Ad valorem Hoover Other Federal Tax Parker Power write-Davis off Balance in Development Fund 2025 2047 Category 3 (Cont.) 11B Inclusion of a 1,000 megawatt, pumped-storage powerplant at Buckskin Mountain, Arizona, and a 1,290 megawatt, coal-fired powerplant at Topock, Arizona, with Hoover & Parker-Davis revenues. ** 1067 10 50 7.5 2.5 3.42 204 102 -- 102 -179 -- 198 1076 11C Inclusion of a 1,800 megawatt pumped-storage powerplant at White Tank Mountain, Arizona, and Federal ownership of 670 megawatts of a large nuclear powerplant at Camp Pendleton, California. 1126 10 50 1Epson Perfection 4870 Photo, 400 dpi, 8 bit, 2,722,672 byte