Analisis Yuridis Pertimbangan Putusan Hakim Dalam Pemidanaan Terhadap Delik Tertinggal Pada kasus Concursus Realis. (Studi Putusan Hakim Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat No.1060/Pid.B/2009/PN.Jkt.Pst dengan Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat No.700/Pid.B/2011/PN.Jkt.Pst).

Judge in law enforcemen thas avery central position, every decision the judge should consider the juridical, sociological and psychological. In the judge's rulingin the case of concursus realists consider the proposed new offense and pay attention to the implication sof the decision.The studywas conductedina normative law. Source of research data using secondary data consisting of primary legal materials (legislation), secondary legal materialsin the form ofa legal opinion obtained from books, internet and legal practitioners, legal datatertiary. The data collected hrough the literature and interviews. Methodsof analysis of this legal research isa qualitative analysis that described the results of the literature, interview sand legislation in force. The resultsof this research was the judge in the case rule don concursus realist other than legal consider ation sin the usual case, in the case of concursus realist judge no tice dear lier judgment, attention toArticle 71 of the Codeof Criminal Law is the referenceto the case in split concursus realist. In the case ofa realist concursus expected investigators, prosecutor sand judges more thoroughly and carefully analyze the facts of the law for the sake of legal certainty, justice and expediency