PERAN KOMISI KEJAKSAAN TERHADAP KINERJA JAKSA SEBAGAI PENUNTUT UMUM DALAM PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI

This legal writing is entitled “The Role of Commission of Judiciary towords the attonery’s Performance as General Prosecutor in Corruption Criminal Action”. The problem formulation was: what is the barrier to the commission of attorney in supervising the attorney’s performance as general prosecutor in corruption criminal action? The purpose of this research was to comprenhend and finding out any data concerning on the barriers of Commission of Judiciary in supervising the attorney’s review were: 1) The meaning of the role of commission of judiciary, 2) Supervising and monitoring the general prosecutor’s performance. The type of this research was normative reseach. The data of this reseach gained from primary and secondary legal sources. The method of data collection was conducted by literary reseach and direct interview to the source person. The data analysis was qualitatively conducted through 4 step, i.e.: description of positive law, systematization of positive law, interpretation of positive law, and analysis of secondary legal source. The location of this researrch was in the office of Commission of Judiciary located on Jalan Rambai no. 1 A Kebayoran, South Jakarta. The source person was Puspo Aji as the Vice of Commission of Judiciary. Indonesia state is a legal state, thus the legal enforcement and justice are absolute conditions. However in fact, the legal apparatus conduct legal violation. One of them is the attorney as the legal enforcement who has authority to conduct prosecution; the attorneys misue their authority due of their private necessities and neglect the general necessities. Thus the president founded a commission named Commission of Judiciary who has duty to supervise the attorney’s performance inside or outside the departement. However the commission of judiciary has not been optimal caused at least the report of internal supervision, the happenings of collusion in internal supervision