ANALISIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN BEBAS DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI

Basically, it is valid for the acquittal decision given to the defendant who has not been proven in Court. However, lately many corruption cases are End-Free by Judge. This research is a normative research that examines the legal norms in force. Normative legal research examines the sources of which become the legal documents related to the decision-Free in the Case of Corruption. Data collection was conducted through a literature study which was the legislation and analyzing corruption cases that have been acquitted by Corruption Criminal Acts Court at Class 1A of State Courts In Jayapura, Papua. The results showed that the decision-free ruling down in the Corruption Criminal Acts Court at Class 1A of State Court in Jayapura could be valid given to the defendant that was not legally proven in the court. This acquittal that might be imposed by a judge if the public prosecutor could not prove the charges in court, but if properly presented by Max, SH as an Advocate on legal aid, Papua said that there were other indications which cooperation between judges and prosecutors public in making vague accusation and there was other indication which were collusion and nepotism practiced in court