This paper describes the Participatory Impact Assessment and Learning Approach (PIALA) which was developed and piloted by IFAD. The approach aims to produce rigorous qualitative and quantitative evidence that can be used not only to identify and assess the impacts of development projects, but also to promote learning and improved understanding of the associated processes and pathways of socio-economic change. Illustrated with cases from Viet Nam and Ghana, the paper assesses the value of the approach for collaborative learning and reporting for IFAD’s country programming and global policy engagement, as well as for the wider development community
Developing an effective impact evaluation framework, managing and conducting rigorous impact evaluat...
The purpose of this chapter are twofold: one, to explore the need for stronger links between and ex ...
In recent years, debates on impact evaluation of development cooperation have flourished. There has ...
Rural development program formulation and project design need solid evidence, especially from rigoro...
Mixed methods approaches are widely used in impact evaluations, but all too often a ‘methodological ...
This paper by Adinda Van Hemelrijck and Irene Guijt explores how impact evaluation can live up to s...
This paper reports findings from a WaterAid funded project (‘Looking Back’) concerning the longer-te...
Mixed methods approaches are widely used in impact evaluations, but all too often a ‘methodological ...
Increased attention directed towards evidence-based aid clearly dominates evaluation discussions wit...
While policy engagement is increasingly considered a key dimension of development cooperation, there...
This article presents the principles and findings of developing a new participatory assessment of de...
In recent years, the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) has increasingly strengt...
Over the last decade, societal pressure has increased on public research agencies to provide evidenc...
Participatory Impact Pathways Analysis (PIPA) is a practical planning, and monitoring and evaluation...
This article addresses two issues: the theoretical strengthening of the participatory evaluation con...
Developing an effective impact evaluation framework, managing and conducting rigorous impact evaluat...
The purpose of this chapter are twofold: one, to explore the need for stronger links between and ex ...
In recent years, debates on impact evaluation of development cooperation have flourished. There has ...
Rural development program formulation and project design need solid evidence, especially from rigoro...
Mixed methods approaches are widely used in impact evaluations, but all too often a ‘methodological ...
This paper by Adinda Van Hemelrijck and Irene Guijt explores how impact evaluation can live up to s...
This paper reports findings from a WaterAid funded project (‘Looking Back’) concerning the longer-te...
Mixed methods approaches are widely used in impact evaluations, but all too often a ‘methodological ...
Increased attention directed towards evidence-based aid clearly dominates evaluation discussions wit...
While policy engagement is increasingly considered a key dimension of development cooperation, there...
This article presents the principles and findings of developing a new participatory assessment of de...
In recent years, the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) has increasingly strengt...
Over the last decade, societal pressure has increased on public research agencies to provide evidenc...
Participatory Impact Pathways Analysis (PIPA) is a practical planning, and monitoring and evaluation...
This article addresses two issues: the theoretical strengthening of the participatory evaluation con...
Developing an effective impact evaluation framework, managing and conducting rigorous impact evaluat...
The purpose of this chapter are twofold: one, to explore the need for stronger links between and ex ...
In recent years, debates on impact evaluation of development cooperation have flourished. There has ...