Income used to measure poverty excludes in-kind benefits, such as food stamps. After valuing in-kind benefits as income, poverty is reduced, but not completely eliminated. This study reviews the current method of measuring poverty and compares it with alternative methods. Differences in poverty rates in metro and nonmetro areas are examined. Nonmetro areas continue to have a higher poverty rate after including in-kind benefits. Changes in the composition of the poor after including in-kind benefits are identified for some subgroups
Summaries Discussions of the conventional income/consumption and participatory approaches to povert...
Description based on: 1989.Issue for 1990 also contains 1989 revised data.Vols. for 1987 and 1988 is...
Poverty measurement based on income or consumption fails to be consistent with welfare: a higher uti...
providing participation rates by state for LIHEAP. Disclaimer: This paper reports the results of res...
This paper addresses the question of whether Non-Cash benefits significantly affect the estimated po...
The prevalence of poverty has been greater in nonmetro areas than in metro areas in every year since...
Includes bibliographyThe fact that different studies seeking to measure poverty in a given country o...
In March 2010 an Interagency Technical Working Group (ITWG) released guidelines on thresholds and re...
Ending poverty is a moral and ethical aim, and living without poverty is one of the human rights. To...
Although child poverty rates continue to surpass those of others, there is growing consensus that cu...
About a third of the nonmetro population had income below the poverty level for at least 1 month in ...
This article addresses three related but distinct issues relevant to the valuation ofin-kind transfe...
In 2000, 8.8 million children received food stamps, making the Food Stamp Program a crucial componen...
Proposed changes in poverty measurement methods would lower the nonmetro poverty rate by 3 percentag...
The Census Bureau prepared a number of alternative income-based measures of poverty to illustrate th...
Summaries Discussions of the conventional income/consumption and participatory approaches to povert...
Description based on: 1989.Issue for 1990 also contains 1989 revised data.Vols. for 1987 and 1988 is...
Poverty measurement based on income or consumption fails to be consistent with welfare: a higher uti...
providing participation rates by state for LIHEAP. Disclaimer: This paper reports the results of res...
This paper addresses the question of whether Non-Cash benefits significantly affect the estimated po...
The prevalence of poverty has been greater in nonmetro areas than in metro areas in every year since...
Includes bibliographyThe fact that different studies seeking to measure poverty in a given country o...
In March 2010 an Interagency Technical Working Group (ITWG) released guidelines on thresholds and re...
Ending poverty is a moral and ethical aim, and living without poverty is one of the human rights. To...
Although child poverty rates continue to surpass those of others, there is growing consensus that cu...
About a third of the nonmetro population had income below the poverty level for at least 1 month in ...
This article addresses three related but distinct issues relevant to the valuation ofin-kind transfe...
In 2000, 8.8 million children received food stamps, making the Food Stamp Program a crucial componen...
Proposed changes in poverty measurement methods would lower the nonmetro poverty rate by 3 percentag...
The Census Bureau prepared a number of alternative income-based measures of poverty to illustrate th...
Summaries Discussions of the conventional income/consumption and participatory approaches to povert...
Description based on: 1989.Issue for 1990 also contains 1989 revised data.Vols. for 1987 and 1988 is...
Poverty measurement based on income or consumption fails to be consistent with welfare: a higher uti...