Onboard module building cotton harvesters currently offer cotton producers the potential to improve harvest efficiency and reduce harvest costs as a means of supporting cotton as an economically viable option in many farm crop rotation production systems. Using data provided by producers currently using this technology in a few southern cotton states, this study estimates current capital and operating costs of onboard module cotton pickers based on field experience and makes comparisons with the costs of using traditional basket pickers. Total per acre cotton harvest cost for the onboard module system was estimated to be approximately $26 less expensive than harvesting cotton with comparable sized basket pickers
The conventional cotton marketing system between the accumulative harvest (H(t)) and includes charac...
The purpose of this paper is to assess the opportunity returns forgone to cotton producers in the lo...
The general objective of this study was to aid the farmer in choosing the harvesting alternative tha...
Cotton pickers with on-board module builders (OBMB) eliminates the need for boll buggies, module bui...
The cotton harvesting industry is in the beginnings of its next technological advance, cotton harves...
Cotton has consistently ranked as a leading cash crop in Texas. In 1997, Texas led the USA in the pr...
In response to increases in cotton production costs, producers are seeking ways to reduce input expe...
New cotton harvesters have been introduced that have higher performance rate as well as eliminate ex...
The number of operating cotton gins in Texas has steadily declined in the past 40 years from 1400 to...
The number of operating cotton gins in Texas has steadily declined in the past 40 years from 1400 to...
Over a fourth of the cotton produced in the US since 2002 has been produced in Texas, with most comi...
Mississippi cotton farmers are adjusting to the current problem of low cotton price and high cotton ...
Cotton production systems based on wider equipment are more efficient (cost less per acre). They imp...
Summary; Introduction and methodology; Cost of operating mechanical pickers compared with hand picki...
Program year: 1978/1979Digitized from print original stored in HDRDue to rising cost of inputs and c...
The conventional cotton marketing system between the accumulative harvest (H(t)) and includes charac...
The purpose of this paper is to assess the opportunity returns forgone to cotton producers in the lo...
The general objective of this study was to aid the farmer in choosing the harvesting alternative tha...
Cotton pickers with on-board module builders (OBMB) eliminates the need for boll buggies, module bui...
The cotton harvesting industry is in the beginnings of its next technological advance, cotton harves...
Cotton has consistently ranked as a leading cash crop in Texas. In 1997, Texas led the USA in the pr...
In response to increases in cotton production costs, producers are seeking ways to reduce input expe...
New cotton harvesters have been introduced that have higher performance rate as well as eliminate ex...
The number of operating cotton gins in Texas has steadily declined in the past 40 years from 1400 to...
The number of operating cotton gins in Texas has steadily declined in the past 40 years from 1400 to...
Over a fourth of the cotton produced in the US since 2002 has been produced in Texas, with most comi...
Mississippi cotton farmers are adjusting to the current problem of low cotton price and high cotton ...
Cotton production systems based on wider equipment are more efficient (cost less per acre). They imp...
Summary; Introduction and methodology; Cost of operating mechanical pickers compared with hand picki...
Program year: 1978/1979Digitized from print original stored in HDRDue to rising cost of inputs and c...
The conventional cotton marketing system between the accumulative harvest (H(t)) and includes charac...
The purpose of this paper is to assess the opportunity returns forgone to cotton producers in the lo...
The general objective of this study was to aid the farmer in choosing the harvesting alternative tha...