To mitigate adverse effects on ranchers from reduced access to public forage, financial or other forms of ‘compensation’ may be required. In this paper, we use results from a survey of Nevada ranchers to examine ranchers’ willingness to sell grazing permits and participate in other schemes that enable them to continue ranching in spite of declining access to public forage. On average ranchers demand $255 per AUM to sell grazing permits, while support for other programs, some of which are performance based, depends on whether respondents trust public agencies and intend to pass their ranch on to an heir
Results from a 2002 survey of Nevada ranchers that asked about willingness to pay for public forage ...
Increasing tension in the Nevada ranch community may have had a negative impact on social capital. S...
Abstract: Livestock grazing on public lands continues to be a source of intense conflict and debate....
To mitigate adverse effects on ranchers from reduced access to public forage, financial or other for...
In response to environmental pressure, public land agencies in Nevada have reduced animal unit month...
Since the late 1960s, the Nevada ranch community has come under increasing pressure from environment...
This study investigated the role that a public land grazing permit buyout would have on ranching ope...
The value of public land forage has been of key interest since grazing fees were first established o...
Federal land grazing fees have been set by a formula that uses a base rate developed from a 1966 stu...
Net returns to investment on western ranches are often low or negative. Ranchers who graze cattle on...
Recent rangeland reform attempts have increased ranchers'Â’ uncertainty of retaining grazing permits...
Policy analysis and planning requires that we know what the likely responses of affected parties to ...
Proposals outlined in Rangeland Reform '94 have been perceived to greatly alter grazing use on publi...
The objectives of this Colorado study were to assess primary reasons ranchers choose to stay or sell...
Past analysis of the impacts of higher federal grazing fees on ranch values have been purely specula...
Results from a 2002 survey of Nevada ranchers that asked about willingness to pay for public forage ...
Increasing tension in the Nevada ranch community may have had a negative impact on social capital. S...
Abstract: Livestock grazing on public lands continues to be a source of intense conflict and debate....
To mitigate adverse effects on ranchers from reduced access to public forage, financial or other for...
In response to environmental pressure, public land agencies in Nevada have reduced animal unit month...
Since the late 1960s, the Nevada ranch community has come under increasing pressure from environment...
This study investigated the role that a public land grazing permit buyout would have on ranching ope...
The value of public land forage has been of key interest since grazing fees were first established o...
Federal land grazing fees have been set by a formula that uses a base rate developed from a 1966 stu...
Net returns to investment on western ranches are often low or negative. Ranchers who graze cattle on...
Recent rangeland reform attempts have increased ranchers'Â’ uncertainty of retaining grazing permits...
Policy analysis and planning requires that we know what the likely responses of affected parties to ...
Proposals outlined in Rangeland Reform '94 have been perceived to greatly alter grazing use on publi...
The objectives of this Colorado study were to assess primary reasons ranchers choose to stay or sell...
Past analysis of the impacts of higher federal grazing fees on ranch values have been purely specula...
Results from a 2002 survey of Nevada ranchers that asked about willingness to pay for public forage ...
Increasing tension in the Nevada ranch community may have had a negative impact on social capital. S...
Abstract: Livestock grazing on public lands continues to be a source of intense conflict and debate....