Recently enacted food safety regulations require processors to meet product standards for microbial contamination in meat products. An analysis of the cost-effectiveness of several technological interventions for microbial control in beef and pork processing shows that marginal improvements in food safety can be obtained, but at increasing costs. The additional food safety intervention costs represent about 1% of total processing costs for beef and pork. Some interventions and combinations are more cost-effective than others
Current policies designed to improve food safety rely on regulation and market incentives. However, ...
Foodborne pathogens cause millions of human illnesses annually, many resulting in death or chronic ...
In spite of the documented success of Pathogen Reduction and Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Po...
Recently enacted food safety regulations require processors to meet product standards for microbial ...
Recently enacted food safety regulations require processors to meet product standards for microbial ...
Recently enacted food safety regulations require processors to meet product standards for microbial ...
As public and private demand for food safety grows, firms need to be able to evaluate the optimal (l...
government requires meat processors to put hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP) system...
This paper uses plant-level micro-data from the 2002 Census of Manufactures, Food Safety Inspection ...
An economic analysis of new meat and poultry inspection rules evaluates the benefits and costs of re...
Under new regulations issued in July 1996, the federal government requires meat processors to put ha...
This study develops theoretical and econometric cost function models for the meat industry to test t...
As livestock producers adopt risk mitigation strategies for veterinary drug residues and microbial p...
USDA is now requiring all Federally inspected meat and poultry processing and slaughter plants to im...
Sanitation and process control costs increased the costs of producing meat and poultry by about 0.5 ...
Current policies designed to improve food safety rely on regulation and market incentives. However, ...
Foodborne pathogens cause millions of human illnesses annually, many resulting in death or chronic ...
In spite of the documented success of Pathogen Reduction and Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Po...
Recently enacted food safety regulations require processors to meet product standards for microbial ...
Recently enacted food safety regulations require processors to meet product standards for microbial ...
Recently enacted food safety regulations require processors to meet product standards for microbial ...
As public and private demand for food safety grows, firms need to be able to evaluate the optimal (l...
government requires meat processors to put hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP) system...
This paper uses plant-level micro-data from the 2002 Census of Manufactures, Food Safety Inspection ...
An economic analysis of new meat and poultry inspection rules evaluates the benefits and costs of re...
Under new regulations issued in July 1996, the federal government requires meat processors to put ha...
This study develops theoretical and econometric cost function models for the meat industry to test t...
As livestock producers adopt risk mitigation strategies for veterinary drug residues and microbial p...
USDA is now requiring all Federally inspected meat and poultry processing and slaughter plants to im...
Sanitation and process control costs increased the costs of producing meat and poultry by about 0.5 ...
Current policies designed to improve food safety rely on regulation and market incentives. However, ...
Foodborne pathogens cause millions of human illnesses annually, many resulting in death or chronic ...
In spite of the documented success of Pathogen Reduction and Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Po...