We study the environmental and economic consequences of introducing a program to compensate peasants of a small economy for the damage caused by wildlife. We show that the widely held belief that compensation induces wildlife conservation may be erroneous. In a partially open economy, compensation can lower the wildlife stock and result in a net welfare loss for local people. In an open economy, compensation can trigger wildlife extinction and also reduce welfare. The conditions leading to a reduction of the wildlife stock are identified and the implications for current and planned compensation programs are discussed
Compensation for wildlife damage to private property is recognized by the Alberta government as a sh...
The relationships of economists with ecologists and conservationists have improved following global ...
This paper derives the welfare loss to landowners from wildlife damage, which is not the same as the...
We study the environmental and economic consequences of introducing a program to compensate peasants...
We develop a model of hunting, farming and defensive action to study the environmental and economic ...
We study the environmental and economic consequences of introducing a program to compensate peasants...
AbstractDamage to agricultural crops by protected species in the vicinity of wildlife parks is an im...
Wildlife exploitation and conservation involves various costs and benefits, which should all be take...
Protected areas (PA) to conserve wildlife are the cornerstone of biodiversity conservation but they ...
Preserving endangered species on private land benefits the public, but may confer cost on landowners...
This study models net welfare impacts on producers who receive utility from on-farm wildlife populat...
The conventional wisdom holds that requiring compensation for environmental land use controls would ...
Financial compensation for damages caused by wildlife is an alternative to lethal wildlife damage ma...
The Endangered Species Act (ESA) is one of the most far reaching pieces of legislation ever enacted ...
Financial compensation for damages caused by wildlife is an alternative to lethal wildlife damage ma...
Compensation for wildlife damage to private property is recognized by the Alberta government as a sh...
The relationships of economists with ecologists and conservationists have improved following global ...
This paper derives the welfare loss to landowners from wildlife damage, which is not the same as the...
We study the environmental and economic consequences of introducing a program to compensate peasants...
We develop a model of hunting, farming and defensive action to study the environmental and economic ...
We study the environmental and economic consequences of introducing a program to compensate peasants...
AbstractDamage to agricultural crops by protected species in the vicinity of wildlife parks is an im...
Wildlife exploitation and conservation involves various costs and benefits, which should all be take...
Protected areas (PA) to conserve wildlife are the cornerstone of biodiversity conservation but they ...
Preserving endangered species on private land benefits the public, but may confer cost on landowners...
This study models net welfare impacts on producers who receive utility from on-farm wildlife populat...
The conventional wisdom holds that requiring compensation for environmental land use controls would ...
Financial compensation for damages caused by wildlife is an alternative to lethal wildlife damage ma...
The Endangered Species Act (ESA) is one of the most far reaching pieces of legislation ever enacted ...
Financial compensation for damages caused by wildlife is an alternative to lethal wildlife damage ma...
Compensation for wildlife damage to private property is recognized by the Alberta government as a sh...
The relationships of economists with ecologists and conservationists have improved following global ...
This paper derives the welfare loss to landowners from wildlife damage, which is not the same as the...