Add to ORKGThis Article proposes that the final provisions of Rule 407 and 411, which provide a list of examples of permitted purposes for which a court may admit evidence, are asking for trouble--specifically, the trouble that courts will interpret the list not as examples, but as a specially enumerated, exhaustive list of exceptions
In all of the federal circuit courts of appeals, application of Rule 404(b) of the Federal Rules of ...
“The great body of the law of evidence consists of rules that operate to exclude relevant evidence.”...
This Article characterizes the history of the Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules of Evidence as...
The purpose of this Article is to examine how federal circuit courts of appeals’ references to the i...
Some rules of evidence are complex. The federal rules governing the admissibility of hearsay stateme...
The object of this article is to identify what makes evidence unfairly prejudicial. The first part a...
It might seem at best quixotic, and at worst absurd, to assert that Federal Rule of Evidence 403-an ...
This Article examines other instances where the Supreme Court has historically held evidence inadmis...
The Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) rest on an unacceptably shaky constitutional foundation. Unlike ...
The evidence rules have well-established, standard textual meanings—meanings that evidence professor...
This article mainly examines United States v. Delgado-Marrero, 744 F.3d 167 (1st Cir. 2014), to illu...
Although the Federal Rules of Evidence are under consideration by Congress, it is unlikely that many...
This Note proposes that the lower federal courts accord the same binding authority to the Proposed R...
Rule 407 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, the “Subsequent Remedial Measures” Rule, is troubling. Th...
Evidence—Injunction—Extension of the Federal Exclusionary Rule (Rea v. United States, U.S. 1956
In all of the federal circuit courts of appeals, application of Rule 404(b) of the Federal Rules of ...
“The great body of the law of evidence consists of rules that operate to exclude relevant evidence.”...
This Article characterizes the history of the Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules of Evidence as...
The purpose of this Article is to examine how federal circuit courts of appeals’ references to the i...
Some rules of evidence are complex. The federal rules governing the admissibility of hearsay stateme...
The object of this article is to identify what makes evidence unfairly prejudicial. The first part a...
It might seem at best quixotic, and at worst absurd, to assert that Federal Rule of Evidence 403-an ...
This Article examines other instances where the Supreme Court has historically held evidence inadmis...
The Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) rest on an unacceptably shaky constitutional foundation. Unlike ...
The evidence rules have well-established, standard textual meanings—meanings that evidence professor...
This article mainly examines United States v. Delgado-Marrero, 744 F.3d 167 (1st Cir. 2014), to illu...
Although the Federal Rules of Evidence are under consideration by Congress, it is unlikely that many...
This Note proposes that the lower federal courts accord the same binding authority to the Proposed R...
Rule 407 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, the “Subsequent Remedial Measures” Rule, is troubling. Th...
Evidence—Injunction—Extension of the Federal Exclusionary Rule (Rea v. United States, U.S. 1956
In all of the federal circuit courts of appeals, application of Rule 404(b) of the Federal Rules of ...
“The great body of the law of evidence consists of rules that operate to exclude relevant evidence.”...
This Article characterizes the history of the Advisory Committee on the Federal Rules of Evidence as...