Add to ORKGSeventy six senior academics from 11 countries invite The BMJ’s editors to reconsider their policy of rejecting qualitative research on the grounds of low priority. They challenge the journal to develop a proactive, scholarly, and pluralist approach to research that aligns with its stated mission
The Management and Organization Review (MOR) special issue on ‘Doing Qualitative Research in Emergin...
The function of this newsletter is to facilitate discussion and debate on questions of methodology, ...
As its starting point, this article investigates claims published in Qualitative Inquiry by Ceglowsk...
Seventy six senior academics from 11 countries invite The BMJ’s editors to reconsider their policy ...
I am disappointed in the official response by the editors of The BMJ.1 2 I am fortunate enough to b...
Greenhalgh and colleagues’ invitation to BMJ’s editors to reconsider their policy on qualitative res...
We sent a questionnaire survey to a random sample of 125 correspondents to the BMJ who had previousl...
[Extract] An open letter from Trisha Greenhalgh et al. [1] to the editors of the British Medical Jou...
AS a qualitative researcher and reviewer, I have had the pleasure of reviewing many qualitative manu...
The desk rejection of submitted articles can be a hugely frustrating and demotivating process from t...
BMJ Open Respiratory Research is now entering its second year as an open access journal. Our aim whe...
We couldn’t be more excited to see this issue out in the world. This is our first one as solo editor...
The impetus for the current FQS issue was the growing impact of qualitative methods in applied marke...
berta to reflect on his observations as a long-serv-ing, award-winning reviewer of qualitative re-se...
It is an honor to take up the reins as editors of Qualitative and Multi-Method Research. For 12 year...
The Management and Organization Review (MOR) special issue on ‘Doing Qualitative Research in Emergin...
The function of this newsletter is to facilitate discussion and debate on questions of methodology, ...
As its starting point, this article investigates claims published in Qualitative Inquiry by Ceglowsk...
Seventy six senior academics from 11 countries invite The BMJ’s editors to reconsider their policy ...
I am disappointed in the official response by the editors of The BMJ.1 2 I am fortunate enough to b...
Greenhalgh and colleagues’ invitation to BMJ’s editors to reconsider their policy on qualitative res...
We sent a questionnaire survey to a random sample of 125 correspondents to the BMJ who had previousl...
[Extract] An open letter from Trisha Greenhalgh et al. [1] to the editors of the British Medical Jou...
AS a qualitative researcher and reviewer, I have had the pleasure of reviewing many qualitative manu...
The desk rejection of submitted articles can be a hugely frustrating and demotivating process from t...
BMJ Open Respiratory Research is now entering its second year as an open access journal. Our aim whe...
We couldn’t be more excited to see this issue out in the world. This is our first one as solo editor...
The impetus for the current FQS issue was the growing impact of qualitative methods in applied marke...
berta to reflect on his observations as a long-serv-ing, award-winning reviewer of qualitative re-se...
It is an honor to take up the reins as editors of Qualitative and Multi-Method Research. For 12 year...
The Management and Organization Review (MOR) special issue on ‘Doing Qualitative Research in Emergin...
The function of this newsletter is to facilitate discussion and debate on questions of methodology, ...
As its starting point, this article investigates claims published in Qualitative Inquiry by Ceglowsk...