Add to ORKGAccording to the epistemic conception of vagueness defended in Williamson 1994, what we use vague terms to say is true or false, but in borderline cases we cannot know which. Our grasp of what we say does not open its truth-value to our view. Crispin Wright 1995 offers a lively critique of this conception. A reply may help to clarify the issues
This chapter considers the question: should we employ intuitionistic logic, not classical logic, whe...
The aim of this paper is to present the solution of the sorites paradox as proposed by epistmicism (...
This thesis is in two parts. In the first part I discuss various conceptions of vagueness and outlin...
Anyone must agree that vagueness pervades the lexicon of natural languages: almost everything we say...
The central thesis of the book is that the proposition a vague sentence expresses in a borderline ca...
There are three main traditional accounts of vagueness : one takes it as a genuinely metaphysical ph...
In a paper called 'Definiteness and Knowability', Tim Williamson addresses the question wh...
A number of serious problems are raised against Crispin Wright's quandary conception of vagueness. T...
‘Epistemic ’ theories of vagueness notoriously claim that (despite the appearances to the contrary) ...
In their paper "Vagueness, Ignorance, and Margine for Error" Kenton Machina and Harry Deutsch critic...
According to one account, vagueness is “metaphysical. ” The friend of metaphysical vagueness believe...
The claim that all vagueness must be a feature of language or thought is the current orthodoxy. This...
I assess a revised version of Greenough’s account of vagueness as a form of epistemic tolerance. The...
this paper I present and defend a definition of vagueness, and draw out some consequences of accepti...
Epistemicism about vagueness is the view that vagueness, or indeterminacy, is an epistemic matter. T...
This chapter considers the question: should we employ intuitionistic logic, not classical logic, whe...
The aim of this paper is to present the solution of the sorites paradox as proposed by epistmicism (...
This thesis is in two parts. In the first part I discuss various conceptions of vagueness and outlin...
Anyone must agree that vagueness pervades the lexicon of natural languages: almost everything we say...
The central thesis of the book is that the proposition a vague sentence expresses in a borderline ca...
There are three main traditional accounts of vagueness : one takes it as a genuinely metaphysical ph...
In a paper called 'Definiteness and Knowability', Tim Williamson addresses the question wh...
A number of serious problems are raised against Crispin Wright's quandary conception of vagueness. T...
‘Epistemic ’ theories of vagueness notoriously claim that (despite the appearances to the contrary) ...
In their paper "Vagueness, Ignorance, and Margine for Error" Kenton Machina and Harry Deutsch critic...
According to one account, vagueness is “metaphysical. ” The friend of metaphysical vagueness believe...
The claim that all vagueness must be a feature of language or thought is the current orthodoxy. This...
I assess a revised version of Greenough’s account of vagueness as a form of epistemic tolerance. The...
this paper I present and defend a definition of vagueness, and draw out some consequences of accepti...
Epistemicism about vagueness is the view that vagueness, or indeterminacy, is an epistemic matter. T...
This chapter considers the question: should we employ intuitionistic logic, not classical logic, whe...
The aim of this paper is to present the solution of the sorites paradox as proposed by epistmicism (...
This thesis is in two parts. In the first part I discuss various conceptions of vagueness and outlin...