Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Pidana Tambahan Berupa Pencabutan Hak Politik Bagi Terpidana Kasus Korupsi Dalam Perkara Nomor: 2233 K/PID.SUS/2017

Corruption in Riau Province to date has been systematic, massive and increasingly widespread involving almost all institutions and power structures. As a result, the behavior of public officials competing to dredge local budgets for personal and group interests is getting more and more naked. The impact, corruption practices have caused poverty and misery of the people. Efforts to eradicate corruption have been realized with the issuance of a juridical framework during Habibie's rule, namely Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning Eradication of Criminal Acts which replaced Law Number 3 of 1971 which was amended to Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication Corruption Crime. In the reformation, criminal prosecution for corruption experienced an increase with the emergence of discourse on the existence of additional criminal imprisonment to revoke political rights for corruptors. This paper raises several issues relating to how the juridical analysis of additional criminal offenses in the form of revocation of political rights for convicted corruption cases in case Number: 2233 K / Pid.Sus / 2017, and how the legal considerations of the judges who decide the revocation of political rights for convicted cases corruption in the case. The method used in this study is the normative legal research method . Judging from its nature, this research is descriptive. Sources of data in this study are primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. The method of drawing conclusions in this study uses the deductive method that is interesting things that are general to be specific. From the results of this study the authors observed that the occurrence of corrupt practices in Riau Province to the weak sentencing for public officials who commit corruption. Therefore, the additional criminal enforcement of political rights revocation basically aims to frighten and provide a deterrent effect on the perpetrators of corruption, so that public officials who had intended to commit corruption become afraid to do so. Especially when considering that’s Riau Province including the most corrupt province in Indonesia, the application of the sentence is to be firm by incorporating additional criminal verdict revocation political rights (the right to elect and be elected) for any public officials who engage in corruption. But still selective and careful in order to realize a legal certainty in the community