Pelaksanaan tugas kurator dalam pengurusan dan pemberesan harta pailit

The duties of the Curator are not always able to run smoothly as specified in the Act. Problems faced by curators often hamper the process of curator performance that should be, such as dealing with debtors by not voluntarily carrying out court decisions. The purpose of this research is to find out and examine the independence of the curator in the settlement of bankruptcy cases and the delay of debt payment obligations, to find out and examine the legal remedies that can be done if the curator in carrying out the task of settling and obtaining bankrupt assets is not independent or in favor and to know and review the actions that can be done by the curator of bankrupt debtors who are not cooperative in a bankrupt process. Data obtained from the study of documents and literature on secondary data, both primary and secondary legal materials were analyzed using qualitative methods. The term qualitative means that the data are described in a quality manner in the form of regular, concise, logical, non-overlapping, and effective sentences, so that the results of the analysis are easily understood and interpreted. The independence of the curator in the settlement of bankruptcy cases and the postponement of debt payment obligations, where the curator is not always cooperative, sometimes the curator must side with those who are more favorable to both the curator and the debtor or creditors, as long as they are still in the corridor of the Bankruptcy Law. Legal remedies that can be done if the Curator in carrying out the task of settling and obtaining bankruptcy assets is not independent or impartial, then the creditor or debtor can report the curator to the Supervising Judge to be replaced or can file a civil suit for the actions or decisions of the curator in carrying out his professional duties as a curator. Actions that can be taken by curators against bankrupt debtors who are not cooperative in a bankrupt process, then the curator can propose to the Supervisory Judge to take legal actions against the debtor. The curator can ask the Supervising Judge to give a warning letter to the debtor or if the debtor leaves his residence, the curator is obliged to notify the Supervisory Judge in writing and submit a written application for tendering