This article re-examines the focused scrutiny standard proposed by Prof. Scott Burris in 1989 and argues for its application particularly during an infectious disease emergency such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Focused scrutiny seeks to tie judicial review of the constitutionality of public health measures closely to the facts of the particular disease and to evidence of the efficacy of each governmental action to prevent the spread of that disease, even when courts adopt rational basis testing
As the fight against the coronavirus pandemic continues, state governments are considering more inva...
Every recent presidential administration has faced an infectious disease threat, and this trend is c...
The 2020 Coronavirus Pandemic and the ensuing shutdown of private businesses—to promote the public’ ...
This article re-examines the focused scrutiny standard proposed by Prof. Scott Burris in 1989 and ...
Emergencies are exceptions to the rule. Laws that respond to emergencies can create exceptions to ru...
The Elena and Miles Zaremski Law Medicine Forum presents Judicial Review of Public Health Laws: From...
The COVID-19 pandemic struck the United States in early 2020. The coronavirus prompted public health...
The coronavirus pandemic caused an unprecedented shutdown of the United States. The stay-at-home ord...
Public health laws may mandate drastic limitations on individual liberty, such as forced medication ...
ABSTRACT: In the United States of America, government responses to the COVID-19 pandemic have brough...
Following the recent decision in Roman Catholic Diocese v. Cuomo,[1] clear guidance regarding the st...
The case of Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley v. Sisolak demonstrates the breadth of a State’s authority ...
In The Right to a Public Trial in the Time of COVID-19, Professor Stephen Smith argued that the COVI...
The COVID-19 pandemic offers a threat with few precedents in modern times and tests the tools of mod...
In response to the very real possibility that there will be insufficient resources to properly respo...
As the fight against the coronavirus pandemic continues, state governments are considering more inva...
Every recent presidential administration has faced an infectious disease threat, and this trend is c...
The 2020 Coronavirus Pandemic and the ensuing shutdown of private businesses—to promote the public’ ...
This article re-examines the focused scrutiny standard proposed by Prof. Scott Burris in 1989 and ...
Emergencies are exceptions to the rule. Laws that respond to emergencies can create exceptions to ru...
The Elena and Miles Zaremski Law Medicine Forum presents Judicial Review of Public Health Laws: From...
The COVID-19 pandemic struck the United States in early 2020. The coronavirus prompted public health...
The coronavirus pandemic caused an unprecedented shutdown of the United States. The stay-at-home ord...
Public health laws may mandate drastic limitations on individual liberty, such as forced medication ...
ABSTRACT: In the United States of America, government responses to the COVID-19 pandemic have brough...
Following the recent decision in Roman Catholic Diocese v. Cuomo,[1] clear guidance regarding the st...
The case of Calvary Chapel Dayton Valley v. Sisolak demonstrates the breadth of a State’s authority ...
In The Right to a Public Trial in the Time of COVID-19, Professor Stephen Smith argued that the COVI...
The COVID-19 pandemic offers a threat with few precedents in modern times and tests the tools of mod...
In response to the very real possibility that there will be insufficient resources to properly respo...
As the fight against the coronavirus pandemic continues, state governments are considering more inva...
Every recent presidential administration has faced an infectious disease threat, and this trend is c...
The 2020 Coronavirus Pandemic and the ensuing shutdown of private businesses—to promote the public’ ...