This article analyzes the alternative dispute resolution ( ADR ) programs implemented by federal district courts, pursuant to the Civil Justice Reform Act. It considers whether Congress should impose ADR uniformity in the federal system or whether Congress should continue to allow district courts to experiment with ADR. The article proposes a solution to this question, which balances the autonomy of district court ADR programs and the preservation of core federal values. The article also examines how ADR impacts indigent litigants and suggests that the federal system reevaluate its approach toward indigents and ADR
Private resolution of disputes, now thought of as alternate dispute resolution, has a lengthy histor...
This article argues that the federal district courts have the inherent authority to compel litigants...
This Comment will address five questions which may arise as challenges to the Western District of Mi...
Any discussion of recent developments in civil litigation must address the virtual revolution that h...
These remarks focus on the Federal Government\u27s use of ADR. The Department of Justice, as the nat...
For nearly two decades, proponents of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) have touted the advantage...
This essay demonstrates that within appropriate guidelines, ADR has an important and growing role in...
Increasingly, courts across the country are turning to non-judicial dispute resolution processes - ...
This article joins an important conversation about the proper role of alternative dispute resolution...
(Excerpt) This paper addresses the current state of mandatory court-annexed ADR in the United States...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
Standard law and economic theory suggests that litigating parties seeking to maximize welfare will p...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
So you are thinking about making Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) a part of your existing statew...
ADR, the acronym that identifies the alternative dispute resolution movement, derives its current po...
Private resolution of disputes, now thought of as alternate dispute resolution, has a lengthy histor...
This article argues that the federal district courts have the inherent authority to compel litigants...
This Comment will address five questions which may arise as challenges to the Western District of Mi...
Any discussion of recent developments in civil litigation must address the virtual revolution that h...
These remarks focus on the Federal Government\u27s use of ADR. The Department of Justice, as the nat...
For nearly two decades, proponents of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) have touted the advantage...
This essay demonstrates that within appropriate guidelines, ADR has an important and growing role in...
Increasingly, courts across the country are turning to non-judicial dispute resolution processes - ...
This article joins an important conversation about the proper role of alternative dispute resolution...
(Excerpt) This paper addresses the current state of mandatory court-annexed ADR in the United States...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
Standard law and economic theory suggests that litigating parties seeking to maximize welfare will p...
Published in cooperation with the American Bar Association Section of Dispute Resolutio
So you are thinking about making Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) a part of your existing statew...
ADR, the acronym that identifies the alternative dispute resolution movement, derives its current po...
Private resolution of disputes, now thought of as alternate dispute resolution, has a lengthy histor...
This article argues that the federal district courts have the inherent authority to compel litigants...
This Comment will address five questions which may arise as challenges to the Western District of Mi...