Add to ORKGOver the past decade, the United States Supreme Court has debated the extent to which employment decisions can be based on race or sex. As yet, the Court has not articulated a controlling test to evaluate the legality of all types of affirmative action plans. A review of the relevant cases, however, reveals that the Court uses the same standards to test the validity of both voluntary and court ordered affirmative action plans regardless of whether the challenge is brought under Title VII or the equal protection clauses
In 1964, Congress passed comprehensive legislation aimed at eradicating discrimination in employment...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was adopted in an atmosphere of monumental naivete. Congre...
Since 1996, many authoritative voices challenge the legitimacy of affirmative efforts to achieve rac...
The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey has held that a white male is not a ...
This note discusses the guidelines established in Johnson. It will suggest that under the Johnson st...
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals, sitting en banc, decided Taxman v. Board of Education of the Tow...
The author questions whether the dicta in a recent Supreme Court case, Local Union No. 1784 v. Stott...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was adopted in an atmosphere of monumental naivete. Congre...
The practice of affirmative action has recently been at the vanguard of intense debate more than any...
The Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which is believed to have had a major influenc...
The Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which is believed to have had a major influenc...
This Note analyzes the manifest imbalance standard developed in Weber and Johnson and the various ...
For the moment, the affirmative action wars are over. In a ten-year set of decisions, culminating in...
Affirmative action can be a remedy for specific past discrimination. This is the kind of affirmative...
In the 1989 case of Richmond v. Croson, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision which has ...
In 1964, Congress passed comprehensive legislation aimed at eradicating discrimination in employment...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was adopted in an atmosphere of monumental naivete. Congre...
Since 1996, many authoritative voices challenge the legitimacy of affirmative efforts to achieve rac...
The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey has held that a white male is not a ...
This note discusses the guidelines established in Johnson. It will suggest that under the Johnson st...
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals, sitting en banc, decided Taxman v. Board of Education of the Tow...
The author questions whether the dicta in a recent Supreme Court case, Local Union No. 1784 v. Stott...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was adopted in an atmosphere of monumental naivete. Congre...
The practice of affirmative action has recently been at the vanguard of intense debate more than any...
The Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which is believed to have had a major influenc...
The Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution, which is believed to have had a major influenc...
This Note analyzes the manifest imbalance standard developed in Weber and Johnson and the various ...
For the moment, the affirmative action wars are over. In a ten-year set of decisions, culminating in...
Affirmative action can be a remedy for specific past discrimination. This is the kind of affirmative...
In the 1989 case of Richmond v. Croson, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision which has ...
In 1964, Congress passed comprehensive legislation aimed at eradicating discrimination in employment...
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was adopted in an atmosphere of monumental naivete. Congre...
Since 1996, many authoritative voices challenge the legitimacy of affirmative efforts to achieve rac...