Add to ORKGThe United States Supreme Court ruled that a vote dilution violation under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act is not an independent reason to deny Section 5 preclearance when redrawing voting districts based on changes stemming from the United States Census. Georgia v. Ashcroft, 123 S. Ct. 2498 (2003)
Part I of this Article reviews the congressional redistricting process in Georgia, particularly the ...
If someone told you that whenever a particular State or political subdivision attempts to change i...
In 1991, reapportionment and redistricting were the most open, democratic, and racially egalitarian...
The Supreme Court of the United States held that a covered jurisdiction under section 5 of the Votin...
The Supreme Court of the United States held that the allegation that a North Carolina General Assemb...
Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 requires certain jurisdictions with a history of racial d...
In June 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down part of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, prompting fears...
In Holder v. Hall, the Court held the size of a government body is not subject to a vote dilution ch...
The 2011 redistricting will provide some interesting challenges for minority voting rights. How can ...
The 2011 redistricting will provide some interesting challenges for minority voting rights. How can ...
The 2011 redistricting will provide some interesting challenges for minority voting rights. How can ...
In McCrory v. Harris, the Supreme Court is faced with yet another redistricting case: Are the first ...
In McCrory v. Harris, the Supreme Court is faced with yet another redistricting case: Are the first ...
Part I of this Article reviews the congressional redistricting process in Georgia, particularly the ...
State and local governments covered by the preclearance provision in Section 5 of the Voting Rights ...
Part I of this Article reviews the congressional redistricting process in Georgia, particularly the ...
If someone told you that whenever a particular State or political subdivision attempts to change i...
In 1991, reapportionment and redistricting were the most open, democratic, and racially egalitarian...
The Supreme Court of the United States held that a covered jurisdiction under section 5 of the Votin...
The Supreme Court of the United States held that the allegation that a North Carolina General Assemb...
Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 requires certain jurisdictions with a history of racial d...
In June 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down part of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, prompting fears...
In Holder v. Hall, the Court held the size of a government body is not subject to a vote dilution ch...
The 2011 redistricting will provide some interesting challenges for minority voting rights. How can ...
The 2011 redistricting will provide some interesting challenges for minority voting rights. How can ...
The 2011 redistricting will provide some interesting challenges for minority voting rights. How can ...
In McCrory v. Harris, the Supreme Court is faced with yet another redistricting case: Are the first ...
In McCrory v. Harris, the Supreme Court is faced with yet another redistricting case: Are the first ...
Part I of this Article reviews the congressional redistricting process in Georgia, particularly the ...
State and local governments covered by the preclearance provision in Section 5 of the Voting Rights ...
Part I of this Article reviews the congressional redistricting process in Georgia, particularly the ...
If someone told you that whenever a particular State or political subdivision attempts to change i...
In 1991, reapportionment and redistricting were the most open, democratic, and racially egalitarian...