The American justice system is premised in large part on the notion that all accused parties are entitled to representation, regardless of guilt or innocence. This tenet requires attorneys to divorce their personal convictions from their professional representations, resulting, in the author\u27s view, in moral disengagement. The author examines the effect such rationalization has on attorneys\u27 behavior when confronting ethical dilemmas and finds cinematographic examples of this theory in a review of movies with legal themes
Complaints about lawyers’ ethics are commonplace. While it is surely the case that some attorneys de...
Regardless of its specific contents, any black letter statutory codification regulating lawyers\u27 ...
The debate over whether it serves or undermines the interests of justice for lawyers to temper the z...
For many, Attorney Atticus Finch’s (Gregory Peck) representation of an innocent African-American acc...
Legal academics have long struggled to define the appropriate role a lawyer\u27s moral judgment ough...
This Article argues that certain key structural factors within the prosecutorial system in the Unite...
Nowhere in law do ethical considerations play a greater part or come into greater conflict than in t...
Much of the anxiety and dissatisfaction associated with legal ethics arises from the categorical qua...
Professional codes adopted by states and based on the Model Rules of Professional Conduct and the Mo...
Should a lawyer keep a client’s secrets even when disclosure would exculpate a person wrongly accuse...
The American Bar Association (ABA) claims a commitment to ethics for all that fall under its jurisdi...
abstract: We investigated the role of moral disengagement in a legally‐relevant judgment in this the...
Suppose you had to pick the two most influential events in the recent emergence of ethics as a subje...
The dominant model of ethical lawyering views lawyers as zealous advocates, who do whatever possible...
This Article explores the tension between autonomy and paternalism that characterizes the attorney-c...
Complaints about lawyers’ ethics are commonplace. While it is surely the case that some attorneys de...
Regardless of its specific contents, any black letter statutory codification regulating lawyers\u27 ...
The debate over whether it serves or undermines the interests of justice for lawyers to temper the z...
For many, Attorney Atticus Finch’s (Gregory Peck) representation of an innocent African-American acc...
Legal academics have long struggled to define the appropriate role a lawyer\u27s moral judgment ough...
This Article argues that certain key structural factors within the prosecutorial system in the Unite...
Nowhere in law do ethical considerations play a greater part or come into greater conflict than in t...
Much of the anxiety and dissatisfaction associated with legal ethics arises from the categorical qua...
Professional codes adopted by states and based on the Model Rules of Professional Conduct and the Mo...
Should a lawyer keep a client’s secrets even when disclosure would exculpate a person wrongly accuse...
The American Bar Association (ABA) claims a commitment to ethics for all that fall under its jurisdi...
abstract: We investigated the role of moral disengagement in a legally‐relevant judgment in this the...
Suppose you had to pick the two most influential events in the recent emergence of ethics as a subje...
The dominant model of ethical lawyering views lawyers as zealous advocates, who do whatever possible...
This Article explores the tension between autonomy and paternalism that characterizes the attorney-c...
Complaints about lawyers’ ethics are commonplace. While it is surely the case that some attorneys de...
Regardless of its specific contents, any black letter statutory codification regulating lawyers\u27 ...
The debate over whether it serves or undermines the interests of justice for lawyers to temper the z...