Add to ORKGThe United States Supreme Court held that evidence tending to show different treatment of similarly situated individuals is required to obtain discovery in support of a selective prosecution claim. United States v. Armstrong, 116 S. Ct. 1480 (1996)
In a trial for rape, the defendant indicated an intention to rely on his alleged impotency as a defe...
This Article surveys significant 1995 decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleven...
The Burger Court has continued to relax federal constitutional restraints on the power of police and...
The U.S. Constitution\u27s Equal Protection principles demand that a prosecutor\u27s decision wheth...
This article argues that a criminal in a search and seizure case can expect disparate results in dif...
Defendants were prosecuted and convicted of conspiring to engage in horserace bookmaking and related...
Defendant was convicted of the felony of possession of a narcotic without a prescription, and was se...
In affirming convictions pursuant to a Texas statute implementing common law recidivist procedure, t...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that the defense of entrapment is available only if ...
As the Burger Court continues to reduce the impact of the exclusionary rule as a matter of federal c...
The Nordby court held that a finding of drug quantity under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b) by the district court...
This Article examines the constitutional issues surrounding the prosecution\u27s interest in the dis...
This Article isolates only two of the many aspects of the Court\u27s labors affecting the acquisitio...
The ever increasing rise in so-called victimless crimes has been accompanied by a corresponding incr...
Use of defendant\u27s incriminating statements, surreptitiously procured by government agents after ...
In a trial for rape, the defendant indicated an intention to rely on his alleged impotency as a defe...
This Article surveys significant 1995 decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleven...
The Burger Court has continued to relax federal constitutional restraints on the power of police and...
The U.S. Constitution\u27s Equal Protection principles demand that a prosecutor\u27s decision wheth...
This article argues that a criminal in a search and seizure case can expect disparate results in dif...
Defendants were prosecuted and convicted of conspiring to engage in horserace bookmaking and related...
Defendant was convicted of the felony of possession of a narcotic without a prescription, and was se...
In affirming convictions pursuant to a Texas statute implementing common law recidivist procedure, t...
The Supreme Court of the United States has held that the defense of entrapment is available only if ...
As the Burger Court continues to reduce the impact of the exclusionary rule as a matter of federal c...
The Nordby court held that a finding of drug quantity under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b) by the district court...
This Article examines the constitutional issues surrounding the prosecution\u27s interest in the dis...
This Article isolates only two of the many aspects of the Court\u27s labors affecting the acquisitio...
The ever increasing rise in so-called victimless crimes has been accompanied by a corresponding incr...
Use of defendant\u27s incriminating statements, surreptitiously procured by government agents after ...
In a trial for rape, the defendant indicated an intention to rely on his alleged impotency as a defe...
This Article surveys significant 1995 decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleven...
The Burger Court has continued to relax federal constitutional restraints on the power of police and...