The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held that a claimant must prove a change in his or her physical condition only in cases where the employer would have to prove the same. Dillon v. Workmen\u27s Compensation Appeal Board (Greenwich Colliers), 640 A.2d 386 (Pa. 1994)
In 1956, the Social Security Act was amended to provide monthly disability insurance benefits to qua...
The Pennsylvania law governing an injured worker\u27s partial disability status and right to vocat...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that the Dual Capacity Doctrine, which allows an injured emp...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held that a claimant need not supply expert medical evidence to es...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that an injured worker seeking reinstatement of benefits, after ...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that an injured worker seeking reinstatement of benefits, after ...
Individuals hurt on the job face potential uncertainty about their eligibility for benefits under th...
Individuals hurt on the job face potential uncertainty about their eligibility for benefits under th...
In 1955, claimant suffered a sacroiliac strain while working within employment covered by the Washin...
The concept of total disability is clarified and expanded in Pennsylvania. Cobosco v. Life Assuran...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has held that when, in a workmen\u27s compensation proceeding, the...
Plaintiff, a dairy worker, suffered an infection in her left arm as a result of submitting to a Wass...
In Eliker v. D.H. Merritt & Sons, the Nebraska Supreme Court held that workmen\u27s compensation sho...
In Stevens v. Director, Office of Workers\u27 Compensation Programs, the Ninth Circuit held that an ...
In Eliker v. D.H. Merritt & Sons, the Nebraska Supreme Court held that workmen\u27s compensation sho...
In 1956, the Social Security Act was amended to provide monthly disability insurance benefits to qua...
The Pennsylvania law governing an injured worker\u27s partial disability status and right to vocat...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that the Dual Capacity Doctrine, which allows an injured emp...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held that a claimant need not supply expert medical evidence to es...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that an injured worker seeking reinstatement of benefits, after ...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that an injured worker seeking reinstatement of benefits, after ...
Individuals hurt on the job face potential uncertainty about their eligibility for benefits under th...
Individuals hurt on the job face potential uncertainty about their eligibility for benefits under th...
In 1955, claimant suffered a sacroiliac strain while working within employment covered by the Washin...
The concept of total disability is clarified and expanded in Pennsylvania. Cobosco v. Life Assuran...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has held that when, in a workmen\u27s compensation proceeding, the...
Plaintiff, a dairy worker, suffered an infection in her left arm as a result of submitting to a Wass...
In Eliker v. D.H. Merritt & Sons, the Nebraska Supreme Court held that workmen\u27s compensation sho...
In Stevens v. Director, Office of Workers\u27 Compensation Programs, the Ninth Circuit held that an ...
In Eliker v. D.H. Merritt & Sons, the Nebraska Supreme Court held that workmen\u27s compensation sho...
In 1956, the Social Security Act was amended to provide monthly disability insurance benefits to qua...
The Pennsylvania law governing an injured worker\u27s partial disability status and right to vocat...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that the Dual Capacity Doctrine, which allows an injured emp...