Add to ORKGThe United States Supreme Court held that the enforcement of Indiana\u27s public indecency statute to require dancers to wear G-strings and pasties at adult entertainment establishments did not violate the First Amendment. Barnes v Glen Theatre, Inc., ___ US ___, 111 S Ct 2456 (1991)
“In its latest attempt to define a workable standard for obscenity rulings, the United States Suprem...
The Supreme Court has held that a municipal ordinance construed to forbid sex-designated classified ...
This note re-examines government regulation of obscene material in the light of the first amendment ...
In Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc., the Supreme Court ruled that nude dancing was expressive activity a...
Erotic dancers Gayle Sutro, Carla Johnson, and Darlene Miller can no longer dance nude in Indiana. I...
In Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc., the Supreme Court held the First Amendment protects nude dancing as...
The United States Supreme Court has held that a zoning ordinance which excludes all forms of live en...
The Supreme Court of the United States held that a content-neutral ordinance, aimed at combating the...
In a 1988 address, Chief Justice Shepard invited Indiana practitioners to reexamine the Indiana Cons...
The United States Supreme Court has held the regulations of the California Department of Alcoholic B...
In Colacurcio v. City of Kent, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that th...
The future of political freedom in the United States hardly turns on whether women have a First Amen...
Nude dancing is a particularly awkward fit with the First Amendment. Should the Constitution protect...
When Sir Charles Sidlye exhibited himself nude on a balcony in 1663, he undoubtedly did not know his...
The Supreme Court has held that a municipal zoning ordinance prohibiting adult motion picture theatr...
“In its latest attempt to define a workable standard for obscenity rulings, the United States Suprem...
The Supreme Court has held that a municipal ordinance construed to forbid sex-designated classified ...
This note re-examines government regulation of obscene material in the light of the first amendment ...
In Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc., the Supreme Court ruled that nude dancing was expressive activity a...
Erotic dancers Gayle Sutro, Carla Johnson, and Darlene Miller can no longer dance nude in Indiana. I...
In Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc., the Supreme Court held the First Amendment protects nude dancing as...
The United States Supreme Court has held that a zoning ordinance which excludes all forms of live en...
The Supreme Court of the United States held that a content-neutral ordinance, aimed at combating the...
In a 1988 address, Chief Justice Shepard invited Indiana practitioners to reexamine the Indiana Cons...
The United States Supreme Court has held the regulations of the California Department of Alcoholic B...
In Colacurcio v. City of Kent, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that th...
The future of political freedom in the United States hardly turns on whether women have a First Amen...
Nude dancing is a particularly awkward fit with the First Amendment. Should the Constitution protect...
When Sir Charles Sidlye exhibited himself nude on a balcony in 1663, he undoubtedly did not know his...
The Supreme Court has held that a municipal zoning ordinance prohibiting adult motion picture theatr...
“In its latest attempt to define a workable standard for obscenity rulings, the United States Suprem...
The Supreme Court has held that a municipal ordinance construed to forbid sex-designated classified ...
This note re-examines government regulation of obscene material in the light of the first amendment ...