The United States Supreme Court held that the sixty-day notice and delay requirement of the citizen suits provision of the RCRA is a mandatory condition precedent for a private citizen bringing suit under the Act, and failure to comply with these terms requires dismissal of the action. Halistrom v Tillamook County, ___ US ___ , 110 S Ct 304 (1989)
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held in Sierra Club v. Electronic Control Design, Inc. that monie...
Congress enacted the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act [RCRA] to deal with the safe and long te...
In 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that a provision of the Co...
Notice requirements of citizen suit provisions in environmental statutes require that notice of an i...
This Note evaluates judicial handling of citizen suits tainted by defective notice. After reviewing ...
Throughout the history of federal statutory environmental law, citizen suits have played a key role ...
The citizen suit provision of the Clean Air Act (CAA) gives standing to citizen groups to bring suit...
The Supreme Court of the United States ruled that citizen suits brought under the CWA are moot due t...
In the shadow of the Supreme Court\u27s constitutional federalism doctrines, lower federal courts ha...
The Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act (EPCRA) mandates that companies using and sto...
Congress creates a federal right of action for private citizens in two ways. First, Congress can exp...
This article discusses the problems of splitting a cause of action between state and federal courts ...
Part I briefly describes the division that currently exists between the Fourth, Fifth, and First Cir...
First, this article will review the impetus and purposes for the Clean Water Act of 1972, including ...
In its first week of business during the new millennium, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Friends of t...
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held in Sierra Club v. Electronic Control Design, Inc. that monie...
Congress enacted the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act [RCRA] to deal with the safe and long te...
In 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that a provision of the Co...
Notice requirements of citizen suit provisions in environmental statutes require that notice of an i...
This Note evaluates judicial handling of citizen suits tainted by defective notice. After reviewing ...
Throughout the history of federal statutory environmental law, citizen suits have played a key role ...
The citizen suit provision of the Clean Air Act (CAA) gives standing to citizen groups to bring suit...
The Supreme Court of the United States ruled that citizen suits brought under the CWA are moot due t...
In the shadow of the Supreme Court\u27s constitutional federalism doctrines, lower federal courts ha...
The Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act (EPCRA) mandates that companies using and sto...
Congress creates a federal right of action for private citizens in two ways. First, Congress can exp...
This article discusses the problems of splitting a cause of action between state and federal courts ...
Part I briefly describes the division that currently exists between the Fourth, Fifth, and First Cir...
First, this article will review the impetus and purposes for the Clean Water Act of 1972, including ...
In its first week of business during the new millennium, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Friends of t...
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held in Sierra Club v. Electronic Control Design, Inc. that monie...
Congress enacted the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act [RCRA] to deal with the safe and long te...
In 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that a provision of the Co...