The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that the Dual Capacity Doctrine, which allows an injured employee to sue his or her employer outside of the Workmens Compensation Act, will only apply if the employee was injured while not performing his or her job function. Heath v. Church\u27s Fried Chicken, 519 Pa. 274, 546 A.2d 1120 (1988)
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held that a claimant must prove a change in his or her physical co...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that an injured worker seeking reinstatement of benefits, after ...
In Heckendorn v. Consolidated Rail Corp., the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that an employer which...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that the Dual Capacity Doctrine, which allows an injured emp...
Worker\u27s compensation statutes limit recovery by employees, for injuries occurring in the course ...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that the exclusive remedy provision of the Pennsylvania Work...
Most current workmen’s compensation schemes allow an employee to sue a third party who negligently c...
Most current workmen’s compensation schemes allow an employee to sue a third party who negligently c...
Most workers\u27 compensation schemes are designed to provide a swift and sure source of benefits to...
In recent years, a new theory of recovery for employees\u27 injuries arising out of an employment si...
In recent years, a new theory of recovery for employees\u27 injuries arising out of an employment si...
Most workers\u27 compensation schemes are designed to provide a swift and sure source of benefits to...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held that a claimant need not supply expert medical evidence to es...
D, a foreign corporation engaged in manufacturing chemicals, sold to X scrap iron including a coil o...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that an injured worker seeking reinstatement of benefits, after ...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held that a claimant must prove a change in his or her physical co...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that an injured worker seeking reinstatement of benefits, after ...
In Heckendorn v. Consolidated Rail Corp., the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that an employer which...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that the Dual Capacity Doctrine, which allows an injured emp...
Worker\u27s compensation statutes limit recovery by employees, for injuries occurring in the course ...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that the exclusive remedy provision of the Pennsylvania Work...
Most current workmen’s compensation schemes allow an employee to sue a third party who negligently c...
Most current workmen’s compensation schemes allow an employee to sue a third party who negligently c...
Most workers\u27 compensation schemes are designed to provide a swift and sure source of benefits to...
In recent years, a new theory of recovery for employees\u27 injuries arising out of an employment si...
In recent years, a new theory of recovery for employees\u27 injuries arising out of an employment si...
Most workers\u27 compensation schemes are designed to provide a swift and sure source of benefits to...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held that a claimant need not supply expert medical evidence to es...
D, a foreign corporation engaged in manufacturing chemicals, sold to X scrap iron including a coil o...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that an injured worker seeking reinstatement of benefits, after ...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held that a claimant must prove a change in his or her physical co...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that an injured worker seeking reinstatement of benefits, after ...
In Heckendorn v. Consolidated Rail Corp., the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that an employer which...