Add to ORKGThe conduct of police officers in accelerating a marked patrol car to catch up with a pedestrian and driving alongside the running pedestrian is not sufficient to constitute a seizure within the meaning of the Federal Constitution\u27s Fourth Amendment. Michigan v. Chesternut, 486 U.S. ___ , 108 S.Ct. 1975, (1988)
This note challenges the Court\u27s implicit assumption that a policeman\u27s good faith reliance is...
Since the case of Carroll v. United States, it has become a generally recognized principle of law th...
The fourth amendment to the United States Constitution protects the right of an individual to be fre...
Discusses some aspects of search and seizure that have resulted from adverse police practice
The recent widely discussed case of Harris v. United States further complicates that already complex...
Section I of this Comment examines Terry v. Ohio, in which the Supreme Court decided that certain on...
The United States Supreme Court has held that a search incident to a valid arrest for a traffic viol...
The first section of this article considers whether the police officer\u27s intent is an indispensab...
Search and seizure in law enforcement is an important area, and this book is devoted solely to that ...
This seizures typology constitutes a most important part of extant fourth amendment doctrine. The pr...
The traditional story of Fourth Amendment search and seizure doctrine involves a complex compromise ...
The Fourth Amendment to the Federal Constitution protects individuals against unreasonable searches ...
This note examines the United States Supreme Court decision upholding the constitutionality of sobr...
The United States Supreme Court held that traffic roadblocks are reasonable if they are set up by th...
In Terry v. Ohio, the United States Supreme Court expanded the range of police conduct that falls wi...
This note challenges the Court\u27s implicit assumption that a policeman\u27s good faith reliance is...
Since the case of Carroll v. United States, it has become a generally recognized principle of law th...
The fourth amendment to the United States Constitution protects the right of an individual to be fre...
Discusses some aspects of search and seizure that have resulted from adverse police practice
The recent widely discussed case of Harris v. United States further complicates that already complex...
Section I of this Comment examines Terry v. Ohio, in which the Supreme Court decided that certain on...
The United States Supreme Court has held that a search incident to a valid arrest for a traffic viol...
The first section of this article considers whether the police officer\u27s intent is an indispensab...
Search and seizure in law enforcement is an important area, and this book is devoted solely to that ...
This seizures typology constitutes a most important part of extant fourth amendment doctrine. The pr...
The traditional story of Fourth Amendment search and seizure doctrine involves a complex compromise ...
The Fourth Amendment to the Federal Constitution protects individuals against unreasonable searches ...
This note examines the United States Supreme Court decision upholding the constitutionality of sobr...
The United States Supreme Court held that traffic roadblocks are reasonable if they are set up by th...
In Terry v. Ohio, the United States Supreme Court expanded the range of police conduct that falls wi...
This note challenges the Court\u27s implicit assumption that a policeman\u27s good faith reliance is...
Since the case of Carroll v. United States, it has become a generally recognized principle of law th...
The fourth amendment to the United States Constitution protects the right of an individual to be fre...